2021
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202100720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric Junction: Electrostatic Design for Charge Carrier Collection in Solar Cells

Abstract: The ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article can be found under https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202100720.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 5c,d, we used a very high permittivity in the perovskite (10 4 ) to emulate [64,65] the situation where the electric field is screened in the active layer due to ionic motion. [66,67] We again observe a nearly constant value of the resistance at low voltages.…”
Section: Charge Carrier Mobilities Of Transport Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 5c,d, we used a very high permittivity in the perovskite (10 4 ) to emulate [64,65] the situation where the electric field is screened in the active layer due to ionic motion. [66,67] We again observe a nearly constant value of the resistance at low voltages.…”
Section: Charge Carrier Mobilities Of Transport Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction of n indicates an increased recombination rate within the bulk compared with the SCR, where p >> Δ n implies lower nonradiative recombination rates. [ 76 ] Additionally, LiAlH 4 treatment implies a reduction by an order of magnitude of J 0 . The latter strongly suggests decreased recombination rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the impact of ions is treated quite generically in the present paper by assuming that ions screen the electric field in the absorber thereby allowing us to treat the absorber as a field free region with an average Fermi level splitting that is representative of the whole volume of the absorber. [45,55,61] We have experimental evidence to assume that this is a good approximation for the samples under investigation [48] but this may of course be a problematic approximation for other samples and materials. Especially in materials with lower mobilities, the depth dependence of the Fermi level splitting inside the absorber might become a dominant factor in understanding the TPV rise and decay.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitations Of The Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%