2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6595/aba58b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric particle lofting from dielectric substrate exposed to low-energy electron beam

Abstract: A nanometer-sized dielectric particle lying on a dielectric substrate is exposed to the flux of low-energy electrons, ion and electron fluxes from a cold plasma and the fluxes from the combination of these two sources with the help of particle-in-cell simulation to investigate the particle lofting phenomenon. The results are of interest for dust mitigation in the semiconductor industry, the lunar exploration, and the explanation of the dust levitation.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the ruthenium (Ru) mirror cap layer, the secondary electron yield (SEY) has been measured to be 2%, with an electron energy spectrum dominated by low-energy electrons, 39 which may reasonably be approximated by a Maxwellian distribution with T e ≈ 3 eV. 40 For the example of the RME, conservatively estimating the reticle SEY to be 2% and taking a photon flux of 10 21 s −1 • m −2 , the secondary electron current density may be estimated to be ∼2 • 10 19 s −1 • m −2 (or ∼3 A∕m 2 ), which is larger than the gas ionization contribution. In practice, this current is be self-limiting by formation of an instantaneous negative space charge layer next to the surface that traps the low-energy electrons and returns these to the surface.…”
Section: Photoelectric Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the ruthenium (Ru) mirror cap layer, the secondary electron yield (SEY) has been measured to be 2%, with an electron energy spectrum dominated by low-energy electrons, 39 which may reasonably be approximated by a Maxwellian distribution with T e ≈ 3 eV. 40 For the example of the RME, conservatively estimating the reticle SEY to be 2% and taking a photon flux of 10 21 s −1 • m −2 , the secondary electron current density may be estimated to be ∼2 • 10 19 s −1 • m −2 (or ∼3 A∕m 2 ), which is larger than the gas ionization contribution. In practice, this current is be self-limiting by formation of an instantaneous negative space charge layer next to the surface that traps the low-energy electrons and returns these to the surface.…”
Section: Photoelectric Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For metals the electron quantum yield is typically in order of a few percent for EUV photons. For the ruthenium (Ru) mirror caplayer the secondary electron yield (SEY) has been measured to be 2%, with an electron energy spectrum dominated by low-energy electrons 38 , which may reasonably be approximated by a Maxwellian distribution with 𝑇 𝑒 ≈3 eV 39 .…”
Section: Photoelectric Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem of calculation forces, acting on microparticles of condensed matter, so-called dust particles, in a plasma flowing environment, arises in a variety of industry applications [1,2,3] and fundamental issues [4,5,6,7], related to the complex plasma physics [8]. For example, flowing plasma can lead to the release of pollutant particles from a processed sample during extreme ultraviolet lithography important for microelectronics [1,3,2], which can lower the quality and productivity of the manufacturing processes. Controlling and minimizing contamination of such particles requires detailed study of the forces, acting on them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an excess of electrons, when exposed to, for instance, radiofrequency (RF) [8,9] or extreme ultravioletinduced [10] plasmas since the electrons possess higher mobility compared to ions. Charge accumulation on these surfaces is studied to account for various phenomena such as particle lofting [11]. Crucial in these applications is the fundamental understanding of charging of particle-laden surfaces immersed in plasmas, for which so far a comprehensive model predicting the charging dynamics does not exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%