2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.95.094111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric properties of amorphous phase-change materials

Abstract: The dielectric function of several amorphous phase-change materials has been determined by employing a combination of impedance spectroscopy (9 kHz-3 GHz) and optical spectroscopy from the far-(20 cm −1 , 0.6 THz) to the near-(12 000 cm −1 , 360 THz) infrared, i.e., from the DC limit to the first interband transition. While phase-change materials undergo a change from covalent bonding to resonant bonding on crystallization, the amorphous and crystalline phases of ordinary chalcogenide semiconductors are both g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Indeed, the transition from the amorphous to the crystalline state in materials such as GeTe or Ge 2 Sb 2 Te 5 is accompanied by a significant increase of ε ∞ and Z*. [6][7][8] This observation is in line with a transition from ordinary covalent bonding in the amorphous state, where the atoms have on average three nearest neighbors, 9 that are held by saturated bonds, to resonant bonding in the crystalline state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…6 Indeed, the transition from the amorphous to the crystalline state in materials such as GeTe or Ge 2 Sb 2 Te 5 is accompanied by a significant increase of ε ∞ and Z*. [6][7][8] This observation is in line with a transition from ordinary covalent bonding in the amorphous state, where the atoms have on average three nearest neighbors, 9 that are held by saturated bonds, to resonant bonding in the crystalline state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The simplest description of Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity of metals and degenerate semiconductors is provided by the Pisarenko and the Drude formulaS=8π2knormalB23eh2mDOSnormal* Tfalse(π3nfalse)2/3σ=eμn=eeτmDrudenormal*nwhere mDOSnormal* is the density of states effective mass,mDrudenormal* is the conductivity effective mass, n is the carrier concentration, μ is the carrier mobility, τ is the carrier relaxation time, T is the temperature, k B is Boltzmann's constant, e is the elementary charge, and h is Planck's constant. The strong screening associated to the very large polarizabilities found in phase‐change materials makes electron–electron interactions negligible, hence justifying Equation . Accordingly, the power factor only depends upon the concentration of charge carriers, their relaxation time, the two different effective masses mDOSnormal*and mDrudenormal* as well as temperature.…”
Section: Upper Valence Band At the High‐symmetry Points Of The Brillomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this value is much smaller than the grain size of the crystalline samples, ~100–200 Å [44], the scattering of electrons should be attributed to an intra-grain mechanism. In GST, the electron-correlation effects are weak due to the high static dielectric constant of 98, which stems from the alignment of directional p orbitals, forming resonant bonding [40,41,78]. Therefore, Mott physics is expected not to be the dominant mechanism responsible for the MIT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%