2016
DOI: 10.1109/tdei.2015.005373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric properties of gas mixtures with per-fluorocarbon gas and gas with low liquefaction temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, there have been a considerable number of gases that were previously investigated and proposed as potential replacement to SF6 [4]- [8]. This paper adopts a simple selection method which is based on four key criteria: dielectric strength, global warming potential, toxicity and boiling point.…”
Section: A Sf6 Alternatives For Insulation Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the literature, there have been a considerable number of gases that were previously investigated and proposed as potential replacement to SF6 [4]- [8]. This paper adopts a simple selection method which is based on four key criteria: dielectric strength, global warming potential, toxicity and boiling point.…”
Section: A Sf6 Alternatives For Insulation Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 1 process to narrow down an appropriate gas candidate from a wide range of potential SF6 alternatives [4]- [8]. From this process, C3F7CN has emerged as a gas medium that can be considered technically viable for the retro-fill research investigation carried out in this paper.…”
Section: A Sf6 Alternatives For Insulation Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, universally replacing SF 6 in power equipment has proven to be a challenging task as no alternative gas can yet be adopted as a onefor-one replacement. Different families of gases have been studied such as perfluorocarbons [5], fluoroketones [6] and natural origin gases [7]. All of these were found to have drawbacks which do not allow a simple retro-fill replacement in existing SF 6 -containing equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the traditional gases mentioned above, potential alternatives to SF 6 that have been considered in recent years include perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoroiodomethane (CF 3 I), HFO-1234zeE, fluoronitrile (C 4 F 7 N), and fluoroketones (C5-PFK and C6-PFK). The GWP of PFCs is high (e.g., c-C 4 F 8 and C 2 F 6 have GWPs of 8700 and 12,200, respectively); thus, there is no significant reduction in GWP [13][14][15]. CF 3 I is classified as a type 3 mutagen and presents disadvantages such as iodine I 2 (acute toxicity) precipitation after repeated discharges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%