2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diesel engine emissions and performance from blends of karanja methyl ester and diesel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
184
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 494 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
10
184
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Diesel and biodiesel fuels have several different properties which can decrease engine performance and increase emissions. For example, the high viscosity and surface tension of biodiesel affect atomisation by increasing the mean droplet size, which in turn increases spray tip penetration [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Considering the differences between diesel and biodiesel fuels, the optimum parameter of diesel engines may not seem suitable for biodiesel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diesel and biodiesel fuels have several different properties which can decrease engine performance and increase emissions. For example, the high viscosity and surface tension of biodiesel affect atomisation by increasing the mean droplet size, which in turn increases spray tip penetration [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Considering the differences between diesel and biodiesel fuels, the optimum parameter of diesel engines may not seem suitable for biodiesel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gogoi and Baruah (2010) found that blends B20, B40 and B60 present an increase in thermal efficiency compared to diesel. Raheman and Phadatare (2004) obtained higher thermal efficiency with B20 and B40. Since thermal efficiency is the ratio of power to the fuel energy input, therefore, due to increased power and less fuel energy input with biodiesel blends, the thermal efficiency is more in case of the blends which matches the present study results (Fig.…”
Section: Design Conditions and Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…According to a review on emission data for heavyduty engines published by EPA (Environmental Protection Agency of USA 2002), from diesel to B20 (20 % biodiesel and 80 % diesel by volume), CO, HC and PM decreased by 13, 20 and 20 % respectively (Lapuerta et al 2008). Because of its reproducibility, nontoxicity and sulfur-free properties, a considerable amount of recent researches have focused on experimental performance analysis of Diesel engine fueled by various sources of biodiesel and its blends (Dasilva et al 2003;Raheman and Phadatare 2004;Ramadhas et al 2005;Usta 2005; Labeckas and Slavinskas 2006;Reyes and Sepulveda 2006;Rao et al 2007;Rehman et al 2007;Tsolakis et al 2007;Hu et al 2008). Furthermore, due to its similar physical properties to diesel fuel, there is no need to modify the engine when it is fueled by biodiesel blends (Graboski and McCormick 1998;Ramadhas et al 2004;Srivathsan et al 2008;Atadashi et al 2010;Liu et al 2011;Zhang et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason can be ascribed to the nearness of oxygen in Karanja biodiesel atomic structure. Raheman and Phadatare [6] discovered Karanja biodiesel mix (B20-B100) in a diesel motor lessen CO discharge (73-94%), smoke thickness (20-80%) and 26% in normal NOx outflow than diesel fuel due to the total burning of the biodiesel mix fuel. Shi et al [7] found that the utilization of biodiesel-diesel-ethanol mixes diminishes particulate issue outflows by 30% and a general decrease in complete hydrocarbon yet somewhat (5.6-11.4%) increases the NOx emissions.…”
Section: Effects Of Biofuel On Ic Engine Emission Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%