2016
DOI: 10.1670/15-086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet and Foraging Behaviors of Timber Rattlesnakes,Crotalus horridus, in Eastern Virginia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…adult males) able to consume larger prey and a broader diversity of small mammals but still target smaller prey indiscriminately (Clark, 2002;Reinert et al, 2011). We must emphasize however that we did not conduct diet analyses to examine the dietary compositions of snakes in our population, and diet has been shown to vary by population and region (Reinert et al, 2011;Wittenberg, 2012;Goetz et al, 2016). We therefore caution against trying to infer dietary patterns from the spatial overlap of snakes with individual prey species or from observed ambush orientations (Clark, 2006;Reinert et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…adult males) able to consume larger prey and a broader diversity of small mammals but still target smaller prey indiscriminately (Clark, 2002;Reinert et al, 2011). We must emphasize however that we did not conduct diet analyses to examine the dietary compositions of snakes in our population, and diet has been shown to vary by population and region (Reinert et al, 2011;Wittenberg, 2012;Goetz et al, 2016). We therefore caution against trying to infer dietary patterns from the spatial overlap of snakes with individual prey species or from observed ambush orientations (Clark, 2006;Reinert et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…forest floor), or vertical-tree, can suggest but not validate the potential prey species targeted through ambush (Reinert et al, 2011;Goetz et al, 2016). Snakes are more likely to encounter mice and some squirrel species (including Tamias striatus and S. carolinensis) across fallen logs (Douglass & Reinert, 1982), shrews and voles on the forest floor through leaf litter and vegetation (Reinert et al, 2011), and S. carolinensis at standing trees (Goetz et al, 2016). An alternative explanation to TRS prioritizing multiple prey chemical cues in ambush site selection is that by combining sitespecific prey encounter rates for multiple prey species, we negated any prey-specific preferences by snakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, many studies have focused on the diets of rattlesnakes, but these are commonly performed by examining stomach contents of dead specimens, fecal matter, or chemosensory preferences of individuals brought into a lab [21,24,60]. Timber Rattlesnakes (C. horridus) have been found to favor arboreal mammals, which is why they are often seen hunting near trees [61]. Banded Rock Rattlesnakes (C. klauberi), on the other hand, have a diet that mostly consists of lizards, so these snakes are hypothesized to utilize more rocky areas [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%