2020
DOI: 10.2994/sajh-d-17-00100.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet and Trophic Niche of Two Sympatric Physalaemus Species in Central Brazil

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to similarities in resource use, competition is expected to be greater between phylogenetically close species and that this process will lead to congeneric species generally not occurring in sympatry (Violle et al., 2011; Webb et al., 2002). However, some studies have questioned this prediction, showing that in some groups, closely related species occur in sympatry (Gambale et al., 2020; Moser et al., 2018; Zainudin et al., 2017). Although niche overlap increases interspecific competition, competitive exclusion depends on species differences in fitness‐related traits (HilleRisLambers et al., 2012; Letten et al., 2017), and niche‐related and fitness‐related traits may not depend strongly on phylogenetic relatedness (Godoy et al., 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to similarities in resource use, competition is expected to be greater between phylogenetically close species and that this process will lead to congeneric species generally not occurring in sympatry (Violle et al., 2011; Webb et al., 2002). However, some studies have questioned this prediction, showing that in some groups, closely related species occur in sympatry (Gambale et al., 2020; Moser et al., 2018; Zainudin et al., 2017). Although niche overlap increases interspecific competition, competitive exclusion depends on species differences in fitness‐related traits (HilleRisLambers et al., 2012; Letten et al., 2017), and niche‐related and fitness‐related traits may not depend strongly on phylogenetic relatedness (Godoy et al., 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When two species occupy the same habitat, a competition for food resources and a segregation of the trophic niches is expected to occur, especially when resources are scarce (Hardin 1960). Indeed, similar species that show allopatric distributions usually exploit the same resources (Lopes et al 2020), whereas some degree of trophic niche segregation takes place when they live in sympatry (Gambale et al 2020). In sympatric raptor species, interspecific competition is indeed a major source of exclusion (Newton 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%