Dietary Acid Load and Bone Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Abstract

Findings on the association between dietary acid load (DAL) and bone health are conflicting. This study aimed to summarize available studies on the association between DAL and risk of fractures or bone mineral density (BMD) in adults. Online databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched for relevant studies published up to June 2021, using pertinent keywords. We identified observational studies (cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional) investigating the association between DAL and risk of fractures or BMD, then selected studies following these reported criteria: RRs with corresponding 95% CIs for the relationship between DAL and fracture risk; correlation coefficients for the association between DAL and BMD; and mean ± SD of BMD values across the categories of DAL. Overall, 17 studies with 80545 individuals were included. There was no significant relationship between the PRAL and fracture risk (Pooled RR: 1.18; 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.41, I2 = 60.6%). Moreover, a similar association was observed between the NEAP and fracture risk (Pooled RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.79 to 2.52, I2 = 54.1%). The results of five studies from four publications revealed no significant association between dietary PRAL score and femoral and spinal BMD (WMD femoral = −0.01, 95% confidence interval: −0.02 to 0.01, I2 = 76.5%; WMD spinal = −0.01, 95% CI: −0.03 to 0.01, I2 = 56.7%). However, being in the highest category of NEAP was significantly associated with a lower femoral and spinal BMD (WMD femoral = −0.01, 95% CI: −0.02 to −0.00, I2 = 82.1%; WMD spinal = −0.02, 95% CI: −0.03 to −0.01, I2 = 93%). It was showed that adopting diets high in acidity was not associated with risk of fractures. We also found a significant negative relationship between NEAP and BMD. However, DAL based on PRAL was not associated with BMD.

Higher Dietary Acid Load Might Be a Potent Derivative Factor for Multiple Sclerosis: The Results from a Case–Control Study

“…According to studies, there is an association between the dietary acid load and a reduced bone mineral density [43]. As shown by a systematic review and meta-analysis, there is a substantial negative correlation between the NEAP and bone mineral density [44]. Furthermore, depression is a common comorbidity in patients with MS [45].…”

Nutritional therapy bridges the critical cut-off point for the closed-loop role of type 2 diabetes and bone homeostasis: A narrative review

“…Overconsumption of dietary protein promotes insulin resistance in obese patients and negatively impacts glucose homeostasis [ 45 ]. In addition, previous studies demonstrated that excessive protein intake increases body acid burden, resulting in hypercalciuria bone loss [ 46 ], while recent studies have confirmed that dietary acid load is not associated with fracture risk, and modestly increasing dietary protein intake reduces bone loss and hip fracture risk [ [47] , [48] , [49] ], which may be related to increased intestinal calcium absorption and stimulation of IGF-1 production [ 50 ]. At the same time, we should pay attention to the potential threat posed by the decline in acid buffering capacity in the elderly due to reduced bone and muscle mass and renal impairment [ 51 ].…”

The interaction between MALAT1 and TUG1 with dietary fatty acid quality indices on visceral adiposity index and body adiposity index

“…Among obesity indices, visceral adiposity index (VAI) and body adiposity index (BAI) are two novel anthropometric measures that hold the potential to enhance the assessment of obesity, body composition, and the identification of metabolic syndrome 13 , 14 . Various factors, including low socioeconomic status, a sedentary lifestyle, environmental influences, genetic variations or expressions, molecular mechanisms, and diet, play a role in the etiology of adiposity 15 – 19 .…”