2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78713-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary fiber components, microstructure, and texture of date fruits (Phoenix dactylifera, L.)

Abstract: Date fruits vary widely in the hardness of their edible parts and they are classified accordingly into soft, semi-dry, and dry varieties. Fruit texture, a significant parameter in determining consumer acceptance, is related to the tissue structure and chemical composition of the fruit, mainly the ratio of sucrose to reducing sugars. This study aimed to understand the relationship between the chemical composition, microstructure, and texture profile of 10 major Emirati date fruits. The soluble sugars, glucose a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Texture indicators determined by PT and TPA reflect overlapping but irreplaceable information. Texture measurement system analysis has high sensitivity and objectivity and has been applied to several commercially produced fruits, including apple (Chang et al, 2018), date (Kamal-Eldin et al, 2020), and pomegranate (Fawole and Opara, 2013). In our experiment, 10 representative indicators were obtained using PT and TPA simultaneously, and the results showed varying degrees of correlation between the texture indicators, similar to the previous study on melon (Bianchi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Texture indicators determined by PT and TPA reflect overlapping but irreplaceable information. Texture measurement system analysis has high sensitivity and objectivity and has been applied to several commercially produced fruits, including apple (Chang et al, 2018), date (Kamal-Eldin et al, 2020), and pomegranate (Fawole and Opara, 2013). In our experiment, 10 representative indicators were obtained using PT and TPA simultaneously, and the results showed varying degrees of correlation between the texture indicators, similar to the previous study on melon (Bianchi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As expected, we found significant differences in several physicochemical indexes among the 23 plum cultivars, suggesting that genetic characteristics have a decisive effect on the physicochemical properties of plum fruit. The effect of genetic characteristics is common in other horticultural species (Ayour et al, 2021;Kamal-Eldin et al, 2020). However, unexpectedly, we found certain inseparable relationships between these physicochemical properties and textural characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, fat contents present reported the lowest contents in all date samples in this study, it ranged from 0.18 to 0.51 g/100 g dry matter in Khodari and Anabarah, respectively. The results obtained were found to be similar to other varieties growing in Saudi Arabia [22] and Emirates [23]. Date palms are very desirable for human health due to the presence of low content of fat, and cholesterol [24], in addition to the suitable fibre contents that can be important to the digestive system.…”
Section: Chemical Composition Analysissupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Compared to results in the literature, nutritive values of CO and SO flesh, i.e., protein and ash levels were higher, while fat, carbohydrate, and energy levels were slightly lower than those of date palm flesh in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) [ 6 ]. Only nutritive values for date palm flesh in the Tamr stage in Barhi cultivar were available, and results reported lower total dietary fiber than our CO and SO [ 16 ]. Interestingly, date palm flesh of offshoot origin at the Khalal stage of Khlass cultivar exhibited higher crude fiber than its cell culture origin [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%