1980
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/33.8.1734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary fiber: the effect of particle size of wheat bran on colonic function in young adult men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A slightly reduced rather than increased laxative effect would have been predicted (28). Particle size has also been shown to be important for the laxative effect of wheat bran, with a particle size ≥ 0.5 mm having a greater effect than a small particle size (14,29,30). The mean particle sizes of our test and positive control materials were 0.6 and 1.0 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…A slightly reduced rather than increased laxative effect would have been predicted (28). Particle size has also been shown to be important for the laxative effect of wheat bran, with a particle size ≥ 0.5 mm having a greater effect than a small particle size (14,29,30). The mean particle sizes of our test and positive control materials were 0.6 and 1.0 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Total fibre: 55·6 % neutral sugars in human subjects fed wheat bran (552) 34 % neutral sugars in human subjects fed wheat bran (623) 35 -42 % neutral-detergent fibre in human subjects fed coarse and fine bran (561) 36·9 and 41·1 % in rats fed coarse and fine brans (624) 39 % in rats fed wheat bran (623) 49·1 % NSP in rats fed wheat bran (625) 58·8 -65·0 % in pigs fed coarse and fine bran cell walls (626) 41·5 % in pigs fed wheat bran-based diet (627) Insoluble fibre: 42·3 % in rats fed wheat bran (625) Cellulose: 6 -23 % in human subjects fed coarse and fine bran (561) 7 % in human subjects fed wheat bran (623) 13·8 -21·9 % in rats fed coarse and fine brans (624) 24·1 % in pigs fed wheat bran-based diet (627) 18·2 -23·7 % in pigs fed coarse and fine brans (626) Hemicellulose: 50 -54 % in human subjects fed coarse and fine brans (561) 69·4 -74·4 % in pigs fed coarse and fine brans (626) 46·5 % non-cellulosic neutral sugar residues in pigs fed wheat bran-based diet (627) Lignins: Undigested in humans (561) 0 % in rats fed wheat bran (623) 0 -4 % in rats fed processed wheat bran (628) Soluble fibre: 72·9 % in rats fed wheat bran fibre (625) Total arabinoxylans: 49·2 % arabinose and 71·1 % xylose in human subjects fed wheat bran (552) Phytic acid: Phytate from wheat bran without phytase is almost not absorbed at the intestinal level in humans (629) 58 -60 % degraded into lower myo-inositol phosphates in ileostomates fed raw wheat bran (629,630) and only 5 % with phytase-deactivated wheat bran (629,630) 58 % degraded in ileostomates and 25 % hydrolysed for extruded wheat bran (loss of phytase activity) (630) Fe: 3·8 % in human subjects fed rolls made of wheat bran and white wheat flour (631) Negative effect of bran on Fe absorption is not observed in rats (632) Se: About 60 % in rats fed wheat bran compared with sodium selenite and selenomethioni...…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of fermentation of fibre is influenced by a number of factors, such as water-solubility, chemical structure of the fibre Nyman & Asp, 1982), lignification (Dekker & Richards, 1973), particle size (Heller et al 1980), other components of the diet and the amount ingested (Keys et al 1970). Processing of dietary fibre may also affect its degradation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%