2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference of motor overflow depending on the impaired or unimpaired hand in stroke patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study showed bimanual interactions during bimanual task-related force production among healthy participants (Serrien & Wiesendanger, 2001), which indicated neural interactions during bimanual force controls. Furthermore, evidence from patients with stroke revealed that motor overflow between hemispheres would alter the independence of force production between the two hands (Kim et al, 2015; Seo, 2013). Previous studies have extensively explored that, during bimanual coordination control, interactions through the corpus callosum (Diedrichsen, Hazeltine, Nurss, & Ivry, 2003; Gooijers & Swinnen, 2014), neural crosstalk, and co-activation of homologous muscles (Kennedy, Boyle, Wang, & Shea, 2016) might in part account for the independence between the force production of the hands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study showed bimanual interactions during bimanual task-related force production among healthy participants (Serrien & Wiesendanger, 2001), which indicated neural interactions during bimanual force controls. Furthermore, evidence from patients with stroke revealed that motor overflow between hemispheres would alter the independence of force production between the two hands (Kim et al, 2015; Seo, 2013). Previous studies have extensively explored that, during bimanual coordination control, interactions through the corpus callosum (Diedrichsen, Hazeltine, Nurss, & Ivry, 2003; Gooijers & Swinnen, 2014), neural crosstalk, and co-activation of homologous muscles (Kennedy, Boyle, Wang, & Shea, 2016) might in part account for the independence between the force production of the hands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taskirrelevant sources of variability in individual finger force et al 2014). Furthermore, it has been shown that the deficits in hand and finger control can negatively influence overall function of ipsilateral arm (Lodha et al 2010;Miller and Dewald 2012) as well as the independence between hands (Kim et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent evidence has shown that bimanual activities are vulnerable to interference and not independent of each other (Kim et al, 2015;Seo, 2013). Evidence showed that interactions among the corpus callosum (Diedrichsen, Hazeltine, Nurss, & Ivry, 2003;Gooijers & Swinnen, 2014), neural crosstalk, and coactivation of homologous muscles (Kennedy, Boyle, Wang, & Shea, 2016) might partly account for the independence between the two hands during bimanual coordination force control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies that emphasized the motor control mechanism of bimanual coordination force control used force accuracy and variability to evaluate performance, under the assumption of independent control between the hands (Davis, 2007; Hu, Loncharich, & Newell, 2011; Lodha, Coombes, & Cauraugh, 2012). However, recent evidence has shown that bimanual activities are vulnerable to interference and not independent of each other (Kim et al, 2015; Seo, 2013). Evidence showed that interactions among the corpus callosum (Diedrichsen, Hazeltine, Nurss, & Ivry, 2003; Gooijers & Swinnen, 2014), neural crosstalk, and co-activation of homologous muscles (Kennedy, Boyle, Wang, & Shea, 2016) might partly account for the independence between the two hands during bimanual coordination force control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%