2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between recumbent length and stature measurement in groups of 2- and 3-y-old children and its relevance for the use of European body mass index references

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To compare length and stature measurements of young children and to examine the relevance of any difference for comparison with body mass index (BMI) references designed for use from birth to adulthood. SUBJECTS: A total of 426 2-y-old and 525 3-y-old children included in the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometrical Longitudinally Designed (DONALD) Study. DATA ANALYSIS: Length and stature were measured to the nearest millimetre using a stadiometre. Agreement between both measurements at age 2 and 3 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, height is not consistently recorded in many PICUs. Further, when height is measured in non-ambulatory patients, it is typically recumbent length which can underestimate height (4). The accuracy of measured height is also compromised by scoliosis, neuromuscular weakness, joint deformity, flexion contractures, and other syndromes (5, 6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, height is not consistently recorded in many PICUs. Further, when height is measured in non-ambulatory patients, it is typically recumbent length which can underestimate height (4). The accuracy of measured height is also compromised by scoliosis, neuromuscular weakness, joint deformity, flexion contractures, and other syndromes (5, 6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An early screening intended to diagnose the metabolic syndrome already in childhood would be very important, but unfortunately, criteria for this diagnosis have not been well established for children. Currently, different classifications are proposed in order to meet this diagnosis (8,9,10), but it seems difficult to establish a uniform classification system applicable universally, since many features of obesity change by ethnic group and also with the age of the patient (11). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the differences between recumbent length and standing height (on average length is greater than height when measured at the same time), a mathematical correction was used to compute standing height for children age 3 and younger. 16 This correction factor is based on data from children who were measured successively in standing and lying positions, and leads to a series of smoothened BMI measurements. BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m) 2 .…”
Section: Anthropometric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%