Differences between smart speakers and graphical user interfaces for music search considering gender effects

Habler, Florian; Peisker, Marco; Henze, Niels

doi:10.1145/3365610.3365627

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, they indicated that male participants recorded a higher SUS score, similar to this current study. On the other hand, another study found no significant difference between genders for two types of interfaces provided to them [48]. Furthermore, this study also suggests that gender does not significantly affect the SUS score and further validated the results of previous research evaluating the perceived usability over a wide range of interface types in Bangor et al [45].…”

Section: Sus Score Between Gender and Nationalitysupporting

confidence: 87%

Usability evaluation of a virtual reality smartphone app for a living museum

Othman

Nogoibaeva

Leong

et al. 2021

Univ Access Inf Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper elaborates the empirical evidence of a usability evaluation of a VR and non-VR virtual tour application for a living museum. The System Usability Scale (SUS) was used in between participants experiments (Group 1: non-VR version and Group 2: VR version) with 40 participants. The results show that the mean scores of all components for the VR version are higher compared to the non-VR version, overall SUS score (72.10 vs 68.10), usability score (75.50 vs 71.70), and learnability (58.40 vs 57.00). Further analysis using a two-tailed independent t test showed no difference between the non-VR and VR versions. Additionally, no significant difference was observed between the groups in the context of gender, nationality, and prior experience (other VR tour applications) for overall SUS score, usability score, and learnability score. Α two-tailed independent t test indicated no significant difference in the usability score between participants with VR experience and no VR experience. However, a significant difference was found between participants with VR experience and no VR experience for both SUS score (t(38) = 2.17, p = 0.037) and learnability score (t(38) = 2.40, p = 0.021). The independent t test results indicated a significant difference between participant with and without previous visits to SCV for the usability score (t(38) = −2.31, p = 0.027), while there was no significant differences observed in other components. It can be concluded that both versions passed based on the SUS score. However, the sub-scale usability and learnability scores indicated some usability issue.

show abstract

Section: Sus Score Between Gender and Nationalitysupporting

confidence: 87%

Usability evaluation of a virtual reality smartphone app for a living museum

Othman

Nogoibaeva

Leong

et al. 2021

Univ Access Inf Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The significant distinction between Graphical User Interfaces (GUI) and voice user interfaces (VUI) has led to a lack of consensus within the research community, regarding the applicability of scales specifically designed for measuring GUI UX on voice user interface systems such as VA [21], [22]. Nevertheless, on that note, it is important to point out that some studies still utilize scales not specifically designed for voice user interfaces to measure the UX connected to voice assistants [23]- [25] .Therefore, there is a growing interest in developing scales that are specifically tailored for voice user interfaces.…”

Section: User Experience Of Voice Assistantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Subjective Scales Measuring the User Experience of Voice Assistants

Faruk,

Babakerkhell,

Mongkolnam

et al. 2024

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of Voice Assistants (VA) in both commercial and personal contexts has experienced significant growth, emphasizing the importance of assessing their user experience (UX) for long-term viability. Currently, the development of appropriate scales that capture user viewpoints after interacting with a system has become a popular method for measuring UX of the Graphical User Interface (GUI) systems. However, the applicability of these scales that are meant for GUI systems on VA is still questionable, hence the need for analyzing the nature of previous scales used for measuring UX of VA. Additionally, in order to keep track of the state of UX research in the VA domain, it is crucial to understand the dimensions of UX that are being utilized. In this study, a comprehensive Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was carried out to identify 21 individual scales used for measuring UX of VA. Furthermore, this study present the evaluation criteria for assessing the rigor of operationalization during the development of these scales. The study analysis reveals that the scales used for measuring UX of VA extends beyond the traditional VUDA (value, usability, desirability, adoptability) principles and incorporates novel aspects such as anthropomorphism and machine personality. Future VA UX researchers should also acknowledge the variations in the rigorous measures employed during scale development, notwithstanding some common and accepted practices. Consequently, an overview is provided, along with suggestions for prospective studies in the field of VA UX research.

show abstract

Rationally or emotionally: how should voice user interfaces reply to users of different genders considering user experience?

Zhou

Zhang

et al. 2021

Cogn Tech Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Differences between smart speakers and graphical user interfaces for music search considering gender effects

Cited by 6 publications

References 25 publications

Usability evaluation of a virtual reality smartphone app for a living museum

Usability evaluation of a virtual reality smartphone app for a living museum

A Review of Subjective Scales Measuring the User Experience of Voice Assistants

Rationally or emotionally: how should voice user interfaces reply to users of different genders considering user experience?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About