2017
DOI: 10.2147/agg.s128824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between the genomes of lymphoblastoid cell lines and blood-derived samples

Abstract: Lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) represent a convenient research tool for expanding the amount of biologic material available from an individual. LCLs are commonly used as reference materials, most notably from the Genome in a Bottle Consortium. However, the question remains how faithfully LCL-derived genome assemblies represent the germline genome of the donor individual as compared to the genome assemblies derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We present an in-depth comparison of a large collectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S8, Table S1). The difference in mtDNA copy number seen between the two cell lines is consistent with previous observations that LCLs are known to carry significantly higher mtDNA copy numbers than PBMCs 77-79 . Because annotation for the source DNA is not available for all samples (Table S1), we plotted the density of mtDNA copy number calculated from the low-coverage alignments and observed a clear separation between samples sequenced from PBMCs and LCLs (Fig.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…S8, Table S1). The difference in mtDNA copy number seen between the two cell lines is consistent with previous observations that LCLs are known to carry significantly higher mtDNA copy numbers than PBMCs 77-79 . Because annotation for the source DNA is not available for all samples (Table S1), we plotted the density of mtDNA copy number calculated from the low-coverage alignments and observed a clear separation between samples sequenced from PBMCs and LCLs (Fig.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…S1, Table S1). The difference in mtDNA copy number seen between the two cell lines is consistent with previous observations that LCLs are known to carry significantly higher mtDNA copy numbers than PBMCs [52][53][54] . Because annotation for the source DNA is not available for all samples (Table S1), we plotted the density of mtDNA copy number calculated from the low-coverage alignments and observed a clear separation between samples sequenced from PBMCs and LCLs (Fig.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Mtdna Copy Number Estimationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The lower precision of LCL samples may be due to the accumulation of de novo mutations over repeated cell passages, however it is unclear why this would occur primarily in low-complexity regions and not throughout the entire genome. Differences in the distribution of sequencing depth across the genome, observed between LCL and whole blood -derived samples [ 23 ], may also contribute to differences in variant calling performance. Overall, these results suggest that the LCL samples from the iHART dataset are faithful representations of the DNA of their donors, particularly if low-complexity regions of the genome are excluded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%