2013
DOI: 10.1177/1403494813481646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between users and non-users of complementary and alternative medicine among people with multiple sclerosis in Denmark: A comparison of descriptive characteristics

Abstract: People with MS in Denmark reported use of a large range of CAM treatments. CAM users differed from CAN non-users in relation to socio-economic factors as well as treatment characteristics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
3
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
22
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study support previous findings that have indicated a widespread use of CAM among people with MS as well as a high prevalence of non-specific and preventive treatment goals [11,16,17]. Previous CAM studies have indicated a high prevalence of female gender among MS CAM users [11].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the present study support previous findings that have indicated a widespread use of CAM among people with MS as well as a high prevalence of non-specific and preventive treatment goals [11,16,17]. Previous CAM studies have indicated a high prevalence of female gender among MS CAM users [11].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Questions on self-assessed state of health and self-assessed QoL consisted of single Likert-scale responses as applied in the Danish National Health Survey [15]. Self-assessed state of health and QoL were divided into 3 categories: low (1-2), medium (3)(4)(5), and high (6-7) as explained in earlier studies about CAM use [10,11,16].…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There were no statistically significant differences between people who practiced ACT and those who did not, in terms of disease type, disease duration, EDSS score, age, geographic location and education level. In a study encompassing Scandinavian countries, between 46 and 59% of 3000 MS patients used ACT and that these practices varied greatly (10). The reasoning behind using ACT was reported as the desire to strengthen and protect the body without necessarily having a specific goal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%