1998
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.98.12010136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in airway wall compliance as a possible mechanism for wheezing disorders in infants

Abstract: The possibility that developmental differences in airway function might be risk factors for subsequent wheezing disorders in infancy has been systematically studied using, among other methods, the rapid chest compression technique (RTC) [1][2][3][4][5]. However, during flow limitation, maximum flows achieved during expiration are related directly to airway cross-sectional area and inversely to airway wall compliance [6]. The RTC cannot therefore distinguish between changes in airway calibre and airway wall pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, far,1, velocity and V'max are related. These considerations can, however, only be qualitative and not quantitative, since the relationship between far,1, airway path length, airway wall compliance and the frequency of the travelling pressure waves is highly nonlinear [26,30,[36][37][38][39][40]. Nevertheless, based on these findings, the present authors hypothesise that the ability of airways to carry large flows is very different in pre-term than in full-term infants.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Findings And Model Hypothesiscontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, far,1, velocity and V'max are related. These considerations can, however, only be qualitative and not quantitative, since the relationship between far,1, airway path length, airway wall compliance and the frequency of the travelling pressure waves is highly nonlinear [26,30,[36][37][38][39][40]. Nevertheless, based on these findings, the present authors hypothesise that the ability of airways to carry large flows is very different in pre-term than in full-term infants.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Findings And Model Hypothesiscontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…The present authors tried to overcome or at least partially compensate for this potential error by using the same face mask and filling it with silicon putty to reduce the dead space, but this could have contributed to the lower values of far,1 among the pre-term infants since the ''effective'' dead space would have been relatively large in relation to body size in this group. Similarly, input impedance measurements include the upper airways, and their influence cannot be distinguished from the lower airways [25,29,40]. On the other hand, study design was strengthened by the fact that measurements were undertaken during spontaneous unsedated sleep, thereby reflecting the complexities of the real dynamic situation.…”
Section: Limitations To the Study And Concomitant Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wheezing is explained by the oscillation of the bronchial wall and has also been called a "flutter effect" that occurs in the bronchi after the diameter has been reduced by inflammation, swelling and spasm in different structures of the bronchial wall. In children under 12 months of age, wheezing of the small airways is largely generated by mucus that partially obstructs the airflow producing the sound 41,42 . The treatment is directly related to their degree of reversibility and can be total, partial or none 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coughing and wheezing are common symptoms of bronchial obstruction in infants, and the genesis of wheezing is in mucosal edema and to a lesser degree in bronchospasm 41,42 . Wheezing is explained by the oscillation of the bronchial wall and has also been called a "flutter effect" that occurs in the bronchi after the diameter has been reduced by inflammation, swelling and spasm in different structures of the bronchial wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to the inclusion of low-frequency components, the elevation of oscillation frequencies above y100 Hz reveals new patterns of frequency dependence of Zrs, with the potential of estimating additional mechanical parameters [159][160][161][162][163]. In particular, at frequencies well above fres, Xrs crosses zero in the negative direction: this is called the first antiresonant frequency (far,1).…”
Section: High-frequency Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%