2003
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00089403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The forced oscillation technique in clinical practice: methodology, recommendations and future developments

Abstract: The forced oscillation technique (FOT) is a noninvasive method with which to measure respiratory mechanics. FOT employs small-amplitude pressure oscillations superimposed on the normal breathing and therefore has the advantage over conventional lung function techniques that it does not require the performance of respiratory manoeuvres.The present European Respiratory Society Task Force Report describes the basic principle of the technique and gives guidelines for the application and interpretation of FOT as a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

24
1,142
2
35

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,105 publications
(1,203 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
(185 reference statements)
24
1,142
2
35
Order By: Relevance
“…In general we found that FOT outcomes were insensitive to detect underlying lung disease when examined either at one point in time, or longitudinally over 1 year. We found that the fdep and Xrs8 were the most sensitive outcomes of FOT in our cohort, which may reflect an increase in the resistance of the peripheral airways and/or an increase in ventilation inhomogeneity of the lung [36,37]. Both of these outcomes were associated with the number of neutrophils, IL-8 concentrations, presence of H. influenzae and air trapping score, although the magnitudes of the effect sizes were small and were most prominent in the cross-sectional rather than the longitudinal analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In general we found that FOT outcomes were insensitive to detect underlying lung disease when examined either at one point in time, or longitudinally over 1 year. We found that the fdep and Xrs8 were the most sensitive outcomes of FOT in our cohort, which may reflect an increase in the resistance of the peripheral airways and/or an increase in ventilation inhomogeneity of the lung [36,37]. Both of these outcomes were associated with the number of neutrophils, IL-8 concentrations, presence of H. influenzae and air trapping score, although the magnitudes of the effect sizes were small and were most prominent in the cross-sectional rather than the longitudinal analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Rrs values .5 SDs above the mean were discarded, as well as rare negative Rrs values probably caused by the subject's breathing occasionally generating flow components which contaminated the signal frequencies. Blocks of 1-s pressure and flow were discarded until coherence calculated over a 16-s window was .0.9 for all data analysed [15]. Furthermore, noise amplitude was estimated at a frequency from the average amplitude of the pressure and flow spectra at neighbouring nonsignal frequencies (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, neither the BD response in FEV1 nor Rrs distinguished between children with and without mild-to-moderate asthma. While Rrs and FEV1 have been used to assess function BD and have been used to distinguish disease [28,31], there is no consensus on either the sensitivity or the correlation between methods in BD testing [15].…”
Section: Spirometry and Rrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were characterized during a baseline visit assessing impulse oscillometry (IOS), spirometry, body plethysmography and a conventional nebulized AMP bronchoprovocation test. [913] Subjects with a positive AMP response (PC 20  ≤ 320 mg ml –1 ) on this baseline visit were included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 40% increase in IOS parameters was based on previous studies using a threshold of 40% increase in resistance measured with the forced oscillation technique or 40% decrease in specific airway conductance measured with body plethysmography. [9,17,18] FEV 1 and R20 were considered as large airway parameters, FEF 25–75% , R5-R20 and X5 as small airway parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%