2008
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkn337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in biofilm development and antibiotic susceptibility among clinical Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum isolates

Abstract: These results indicate that biofilm formation can protect mycoplasma cells from antibiotics and host defences, favouring their persistence in chronically infected or colonized patients while increasing resistance to antimicrobial agents. Therefore, the capacity to form biofilms by Ureaplasma spp. isolates should be considered when antibiotic treatments are required.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
46
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…self-replicate, and can form a biofilm 32) . Although the biofilm shows low virulence, these organisms evade the host immune response and increase the resistance to antibiotic treatment.…”
Section: Ureaplasma and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…self-replicate, and can form a biofilm 32) . Although the biofilm shows low virulence, these organisms evade the host immune response and increase the resistance to antibiotic treatment.…”
Section: Ureaplasma and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the biofilm shows low virulence, these organisms evade the host immune response and increase the resistance to antibiotic treatment. The exact mechanism remains unknown but complicates treatment options with antibiotics in general 9,32) and may explain the inconsistent therapy effects.…”
Section: Ureaplasma and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biofilm is by no means affected by the increase in pH, which may be the result of metabolic events of the amplified bacterial population (Udayalaxmi et al, 2012). A biofilm is an intricate collection of sessile bacterial 13 cells, which is covered by an extracellular matrix of biopolymeric substances (García-Castillo et al, 2008). The pathogenic function of a biofilm is to allow the bacteria to repel the host's immune defenses and tolerate higher concentrations of antimicrobial agents, explaining the recurrence rates of BV (Danielsson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Pathogenesis Of Bacterial Vaginosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledged pathogens include Escherichia coli, other Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococci (Enterococcus faecalis), Staphylococci (S. aureus and CNS-coagulase negative Staphylococci) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but may also include Chlamydia trachomatis and the urogenital Mycoplasmata, Ureaplasma species (U. parvum and U. urealyticum) and Mycoplasma species (M. hominis and M. genitalium) (66). E.coli, Staphylococci and Enterococci may generate bacterial biofilms (67)(68)(69), whereas agents such as Ureaplasma spp., Chlamydia trachomatis and Enterococci may infect prostate cells and act intracellularly.…”
Section: Two Pivotal Macrolide Targets In the Prostate Gland: Intracementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Categories II CBP and III CP/CPPS may be caused by cryptic, difficult-to-grow bacteria such as Chlamydia trachomatis and the urogenital Mycoplasmata. Electron microscopy, new molecular diagnostic methods for the detection of bacterial nucleic acids and immunological methods able to detect, at the infection site, secretory IgAs specific to these micro-organisms, appear to be the diagnostic techniques of choice for detecting difficult-to-diagnose chronic infections (68,69).…”
Section: Two Pivotal Macrolide Targets In the Prostate Gland: Intracementioning
confidence: 99%