2013
DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.118499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in care between general medicine and respiratory specialists in the management of patients hospitalized for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Abstract: CONTEXT:Hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) may be managed by either respiratory specialists (RS) or general medicine physicians (GMP). While previous studies have audited the hospital AECOPD management of RS, only a small number of studies have evaluated the management of GMP.AIMS:The aims of this study were to firstly examine the differences in AECOPD management of GMP and RS and secondly compare their care to national COPD guidelines.METHODS:A ret… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have compared the differences in GP and respiratory specialist in terms of post-exacerbation management and outcomes, with one showing that although there were no differences in the 12-month re-admission and mortality rates between patients, there was significant difference in the management of acute exacerbations between the two groups. 22 One potential mechanism explaining the seemingly higher adherence to guidelines among GPs in our study is that generally more complicated patients, such as those with more intensive symptoms, unsatisfactory response to previous therapies, and higher burden of comorbidity, are referred to specialists. This might result in specialists having to consider several different factors in their choice of treatment, not just what guidelines recommend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Previous studies have compared the differences in GP and respiratory specialist in terms of post-exacerbation management and outcomes, with one showing that although there were no differences in the 12-month re-admission and mortality rates between patients, there was significant difference in the management of acute exacerbations between the two groups. 22 One potential mechanism explaining the seemingly higher adherence to guidelines among GPs in our study is that generally more complicated patients, such as those with more intensive symptoms, unsatisfactory response to previous therapies, and higher burden of comorbidity, are referred to specialists. This might result in specialists having to consider several different factors in their choice of treatment, not just what guidelines recommend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Various factors have been implicated in increasing LOS of hospital admissions, both clinical [ 6 – 10 ] and social [ 11 ]. European health systems have a large inter-hospital variability in terms of resources and the range of services offered [ 12 , 13 ], and some previous reports have found a relationship between LOS and such factors [ 4 , 14 , 15 ], whilst others have not [ 16 , 17 ]. To our knowledge, there has been no comprehensive analysis studying the effects of clinical, organisational and resource factors on LOS in European patients admitted with exacerbations of COPD across a range of European countries and healthcare systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, AECOPD management by pneumologists follows guidelines closer than that by internists, and this may lead to better management of hospitalized patients and to shorter mean stays. [ 24 25 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%