1998
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.6.9804029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Contributing Factors to Tuberculosis Incidence in U.S.-born and Foreign-born Persons

Abstract: To determine the factors contributing to tuberculosis incidence in the U.S.-born and foreign-born populations in San Francisco, California, and to assess the effectiveness of tuberculosis control efforts in these populations, we performed a population-based molecular epidemiologic study using 367 patients with strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis recently introduced into the city. IS6110-based and PGRS-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analyses were performed on M. tuberculosis isolates. P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
3
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
58
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In combination with sociological patterns of assortment, this low transmissibility might generate the kind of stable association between host and pathogen populations that we observe. This explanation is consistent with previous observations of very limited transmission from ethnically defined, foreign-born patient populations to U.S.-born individuals (42,43). However, the apparent longevity of the associations revealed by this study is surprising.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In combination with sociological patterns of assortment, this low transmissibility might generate the kind of stable association between host and pathogen populations that we observe. This explanation is consistent with previous observations of very limited transmission from ethnically defined, foreign-born patient populations to U.S.-born individuals (42,43). However, the apparent longevity of the associations revealed by this study is surprising.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…4. These clades are (16,44), (2,9,10,15,33,43,65,68,72,74), (4,14,23,57,86), (7,56,70), (28,58,84), (47, 55, 67, 69, 95, 97), (46, 79), (76, 83), (18,22,35,40,81), (38,60) where m is the number of terminal clades in the phylogeny, n k is the number of isolates in clade k, d ij is the number of deletions by which isolates i and j differ, and t ij is the number of bands by which the IS6110 fingerprints of isolates i and j differ.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we found that 57.9% of immigrants in mixed clusters were infected with TB strains that had already been identified in the native population. Our study shows a more extensive transmission between the two populations in Madrid than other authors have shown previously (3,9,22), even taking into account that in Madrid the period from arrival to the time of diagnosis of active TB was shorter than the parallel period in those studies. Probably, the sociocultural characteristics of immigrants coming to Spain, many of them sharing a common language with Spanish-born people, facilitate interactions between foreign-born people and the native population.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…However, restriction fragment length polymorphism studies have detected relatively little TB transmission from foreign-born residents to the general population [3,17]. The estimated proportion of active TB cases among the native-born that can be attributed to transmission from the foreign-born may be as low as 2% [18] or 11% [19], or as much as 17% [16,[20][21][22]. In one USA study, foreign-born TB patients were more likely to have acquired TB from USA-born individuals than vice versa [20]!…”
Section: Impact Of Tb Among the Foreign-born Within Low-incidence Coumentioning
confidence: 99%