2020
DOI: 10.5304/jafscd.2020.094.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Crop Selection, Resource Constraints, and Crop Use Values Among Female- and Male-headed Smallholder Households in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda

Abstract: A growing body of research suggests female-and male-headed households in low-and middleincome countries differ in terms of crop choices, access to resources for growing different crops, and values placed on crops for home consumption versus market sale. To better understand relationships between gender of the household head, household resources, individual values, and crop choices, we draw on original survey data collected

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings reveal that most of the households in Kenya and Tanzania were maleheaded, which is comparable to other studies [50,51]. The number of male-headed household in Kenya was also found to be significantly higher than in Tanzania.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings reveal that most of the households in Kenya and Tanzania were maleheaded, which is comparable to other studies [50,51]. The number of male-headed household in Kenya was also found to be significantly higher than in Tanzania.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Previous studies have revealed that male-headed households tend to be faster at adopting certain agroecological strategies [52], while female households lagged in the adoption of modern practices [53]. Reynolds et al, however, found that female-headed households were more likely to plant diverse crops per hectare [50]. There is, therefore, a need for gender-sensitive policies and interventions that could promote equal access to productive resources in the agriculture sector, particularly in TAV and crucifer production systems [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of household-whether it is male-headed, or female-headed also impacts how the household organizes itself [14]. Men and women in male-headed households might have different preferences, particularly compared with women in female headed households [24]. Understanding gender dynamics is thus important for identifying direct users of interventions (who is considered responsible for the different tasks, making investments and doing the work), and for determining who might benefit or lose from them [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%