2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00124.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Interest Rate Policy at the ECB and the Fed: An Investigation with a Medium‐Scale DSGE Model

Abstract: Using two estimated models for the euro area and the United States, this paper investigates whether the observed difference in the amplitude of the interest rate cycle since 1999 in both areas is due to differences in the estimated monetary policy reaction function, differences in the structure of the economy or differences in the size and nature of the shocks hitting both economies. The paper concludes that differences in the type, size and persistence of shocks in both areas can largely explain the different… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
46
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
13
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the fact that by smoothing the interest rate, the monetary authority is much more accommodative and therefore its stabilizing effect is lower. This last result seems to be of particular interest since, as documented by many empirical papers (among others Sahuc andSmets 2008, Smets andWouters 2003) both the FED and the ECB seem to adopt Taylor rule with very high degree of smoothing-approximately equal to 0.8, as in our benchmark calibration.…”
Section: Price and Wage Rigidities Nominal Volatility And Growthmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is due to the fact that by smoothing the interest rate, the monetary authority is much more accommodative and therefore its stabilizing effect is lower. This last result seems to be of particular interest since, as documented by many empirical papers (among others Sahuc andSmets 2008, Smets andWouters 2003) both the FED and the ECB seem to adopt Taylor rule with very high degree of smoothing-approximately equal to 0.8, as in our benchmark calibration.…”
Section: Price and Wage Rigidities Nominal Volatility And Growthmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although the two organizations serve similar roles in their respective economies, one study suggests that the ECB has moved its policy rate much less frequently than the Fed and that their interest rate behavior was rather different [46]. However, both organizations have had to face the effects of the recent financial crisis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wage rigidity parameter ξ varies between 0.50 and 0.90 on a quarterly basis, comprising the estimates of Sahuc and Smets (2007) and Smets and Wouters (2005) for the euro area and for the U.S. economy, and adjustments costs φ between 0.0 and 0.2, which is in the order of magnitude of the estimates of Hall (2004) for U.S. industries. The parameter values β=0.99, ε=6, η=6, κ=1 and φ=2.88 and the labour supply shock μ t = 0.88μ t-1 +ν t on κ with the innovation ν of 0.42 standard errors are taken from the U.S. estimates in Sahuc and Smets (2008) and Smets and Wouters (2005). Figure 1 illustrates the welfare consequences of nominal and real labour market rigidities for the labour supply shock.…”
Section: Interaction Between Nominal and Real Labour Market Rigiditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%