2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Keratoconus as a Function of Gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
58
1
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
10
58
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the stratified analysis and univariate logistic regression for gender, females were twice as likely to report a positive family history. This observation was previously published by the CLEK Study Group 23. Although it is possible that females have a greater predisposition to disease, this may simply be a reporting bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the stratified analysis and univariate logistic regression for gender, females were twice as likely to report a positive family history. This observation was previously published by the CLEK Study Group 23. Although it is possible that females have a greater predisposition to disease, this may simply be a reporting bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Although it is possible that females have a greater predisposition to disease, this may simply be a reporting bias. Gender was also considered a confounder because previous reports describe differences in KC disease severity between males and females, when measured by visual acuity and certain slit-lamp signs 23. In the stratified and univariate logistic regression for race, Caucasians were 72% more likely to have a self-reported family history as compared with African–Americans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women were more likely than men to report ocular symptoms of dryness and complaints based upon a composite score of ocular symptoms. Gender differences may exist in patient history, vision, and ocular symptoms in keratoconus patients [25]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the CLEK study, it was found that women had made more visits to their eye care practitioner in the previous 12 months. 15 This difference could increase the chance of female representation in that study although more men were nevertheless enrolled. If the same tendency for women to make more visits to their eye care practitioner was a factor in the findings from other studies, then the same bias toward understating male representation among KC patients could also apply to them.…”
Section: Gender Biasmentioning
confidence: 98%