2013
DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-9-29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in learning rates for item and associative memories between amnestic mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls

Abstract: BackgroundIt has been established that the overall performance of associative memory was disproportionately impaired in contrast to item memory in aMCI (Amnestic mild cognitive impairment) patients, but little is known about the specific aspects of the memory process that show differences between aMCI and healthy controls. By comparing an item-item associative learning test with an individual item learning test, the present study investigated whether the rate of learning was slower in associative memory than i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this may restrict our conclusions to results on CVLT‐II, we will argue that it may also represent a strength: the scores were expected to tap the same cognitive domain and to have the same sensitivity and level of difficulty, which may be difficult to obtain when using tests from different test‐batteries and traditions. Although we showed that CVLT‐II was sensitive to age‐related cognitive changes, information about other aspects of memory function (see Wang, Li, Li & Zhang, ), attention and executive function (Reinvang, Deary, Fjell, Steen, Espeseth & Parasuraman, , Reinvang et al . ) are of importance before concluding about cognitive change in an individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Although this may restrict our conclusions to results on CVLT‐II, we will argue that it may also represent a strength: the scores were expected to tap the same cognitive domain and to have the same sensitivity and level of difficulty, which may be difficult to obtain when using tests from different test‐batteries and traditions. Although we showed that CVLT‐II was sensitive to age‐related cognitive changes, information about other aspects of memory function (see Wang, Li, Li & Zhang, ), attention and executive function (Reinvang, Deary, Fjell, Steen, Espeseth & Parasuraman, , Reinvang et al . ) are of importance before concluding about cognitive change in an individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We measured participants’ associative memory using the paired-associative learning test (PALT). The PALT is a standardized neuropsychological assessment specifically designed to evaluate associative memory in Chinese (Xu and Wu, 1986; Huo et al, 2014), and has been widely used in previous studies due to its high validity and reliability (Wang et al, 2013; Zheng et al, 2015). The test is designed as a study-test paradigm in which the participants study six novel and six semantically related word pairs and are asked to perform a cued recall test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence points to rate of learning as a key feature of aMCI and early onset dementia (Hanseeuw et al, 2011;Walsh et al, 2014); whilst Wang, Li, Li and Zhang (2013) have identified a key variable under conditions using massed trials in aMCI: the impairment in encoding into memory of successive items. Alternatively, it may be acknowledged that memory precision gets worse with age.…”
Section: Time Manages Interference 23mentioning
confidence: 99%