2002
DOI: 10.1007/s10016-001-0163-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Neointima Formation between Impervious and Porous Polytetrafluoroethylene Vascular Patch Material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…45 Wong et al reported that porous and impervious ePTFE vascular patches of 10 Â 15 mm 2 in size implanted in dogs for 30 and 60 days did not reveal any significant difference in terms of neointima formation and the cellular composition of the neointima. 46 These findings however used short segments of graft, in which pannus ingrowth might have played a major role. In the work of Shi et al, 18 which used a similar experimental protocol as we did, they reported that fallout-based endothelialization occurred on the lumen of impervious prostheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…45 Wong et al reported that porous and impervious ePTFE vascular patches of 10 Â 15 mm 2 in size implanted in dogs for 30 and 60 days did not reveal any significant difference in terms of neointima formation and the cellular composition of the neointima. 46 These findings however used short segments of graft, in which pannus ingrowth might have played a major role. In the work of Shi et al, 18 which used a similar experimental protocol as we did, they reported that fallout-based endothelialization occurred on the lumen of impervious prostheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contreras et al implanted 2‐cm long and 2‐mm ID ePTFE grafts in the rabbit common carotid artery for 8 weeks and found no effect of permeability on either patency rate or neointima formation 45. Wong et al reported that porous and impervious ePTFE vascular patches of 10 × 15 mm 2 in size implanted in dogs for 30 and 60 days did not reveal any significant difference in terms of neointima formation and the cellular composition of the neointima 46. These findings however used short segments of graft, in which pannus ingrowth might have played a major role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atherosclerotic vascular disease is one of the most common causes of death and disability worldwide [1]. Vascular grafts, which are commercially available, are special tubes that serve as artificial replacements for damaged and diseased blood vessels; these grafts are mainly produced from polyesterknitted or woven fabrics [2,3] or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) [4][5][6][7]. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is well recognised in biomedical applications because of its biocompatibility, resilience, flexibility, durability, and resistance to biodegradation and sterilisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, biologic patch materials used are limited to prosthetic materials, autologous pericardium, and allogenic or xenogenic (glutaraldehyde‐fixed) pericardium 3–9. However, these patches have well‐known limitations, including infection, thrombogenicity, calcification, foreign body reaction, and the lack of growth potential 3–9. The creation of a reabsorbable and remodelable patch will be therefore very interesting in this kind of surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%