2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in pigment composition, photosynthetic rates and chlorophyll fluorescence images of sun and shade leaves of four tree species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
168
2
16

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
34
168
2
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Since higher SLW is expected in high light grown leaves (Krall et al, 1995;Murchie and Horton, 1997;Portes et al, 2006), this unexpected result can be explained by the differences between leaf thickness in sun and shade leaves. Lichtenthaler et al (2007) also verified higher total Chl (a+b) contents per unit of leaf area in sun leaves and needles in the four tree species studied; however when expressed on a dry matter basis, shade leaves and needles presented higher Chl a+b content.…”
Section: Light and Co 2 Response Curvessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Since higher SLW is expected in high light grown leaves (Krall et al, 1995;Murchie and Horton, 1997;Portes et al, 2006), this unexpected result can be explained by the differences between leaf thickness in sun and shade leaves. Lichtenthaler et al (2007) also verified higher total Chl (a+b) contents per unit of leaf area in sun leaves and needles in the four tree species studied; however when expressed on a dry matter basis, shade leaves and needles presented higher Chl a+b content.…”
Section: Light and Co 2 Response Curvessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In young H. prostrata leaves, pheophytin was highly abundant while chlorophylls only accumulated as the leaves matured, a situation similar to that found in maize, where pheophytin accumulates in etiolated leaves prior to light-regulated conversion into chlorophyll (Ignatov and Litvin, 1995). The chlorophyll a/b ratio was also very low in young H. prostrata leaves (Sulpice et al, 2014) and resembled ratios found in shade leaves, with 2-fold lower CO 2 assimilation rates (Lichtenthaler et al, 2007). In young leaves of H. prostrata, the low total chlorophyll and low chlorophyll a/b ratio are accompanied by a 10-fold lower photosynthetic capacity compared with maximum Rubisco activity in mature leaves (Lambers et al, 2012b;Sulpice et al, 2014).…”
Section: Young H Prostrata Leaves Show Delayed Development Of Functisupporting
confidence: 71%
“…and fir (Abies alba Mill.) had a higher total chlorophyll content on a leaf dry weight basis in shade adapted than in sun adapted leaves, however, this trend was reversed when sun and shade leaves were compared on a leaf area basis (Lichtenthaler et al, 2007a). Chlorophyll a to b ratio and maximum net photosynthetic CO 2 assimilation at saturating irradiance were higher with sun-adapted leaves.…”
Section: Chlorophyll In Sun and Shade Leavesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Sun leaves are known to differ from shade leaves in their composition of photosynthetic pigments, chloroplast ultrastructure, photosynthetic rates, and resistance to light stress (Anderson et al, 1995;Lichtenthaler et al, 1981;Lichtenthaler et al, 1982;Sarijeva et al 2007;Lichtenthaler et al, 2007a;Sims and Pearcy, 1991). Maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.), beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), linden (Tilia cordata Mill.)…”
Section: Chlorophyll In Sun and Shade Leavesmentioning
confidence: 99%