In normal human cells the amount of excision of ultraviolet damage to DNA saturates at high doses. In these cells some chemicals mimic ultraviolet damage as far as their biological and repair characteristics are concerned. One of these chemicals is N-acetoxy-2-acetylaminofluorene. We determined whether the limited repair capacity for ultraviolet damage was affected by treatment with N-acetoxy-2-acetylaminofluorene. To Biological systems possess a number of enzymatic mechanisms to repair physical and chemical damage to their DNA (1-4). One of them-excision repair-involves four (sometimes five) general steps: (N-glycosidase action), incision, excision, polymerization, and ligation. This process acts upon a large number of chemically distinct damages induced by agents such as ultraviolet (UV), ionizing radiation, and a variety of chemical mutagens and carcinogens. Although it is reasonable that the versatility in substrate recognition for repair may be provided by a number of specific endonucleases each of which probably recognizes a class of distortion of the damaged site, the number of classes identified so far is small. A crude classification in terms of repair characteristics is into UV and ionizing radiation type (5).UV-induced pyrimidine dimers and N-acetoxy-2-acetylaminofluorene (AAAF) lesions in DNA are substrates for excision repair in human cells, and AAAF damage mimics UV damage in the following ways: (i) both are repaired by a long patch mechanism (about 100 nucleotides) (5); (ii) xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) cells deficient in repairing UV damage are also deficient in repairing AAAF damage (6, 7); (Mii) XP cells are more sensitive than normal cells to the cytotoxic and mutagenic activity of both UV and AAAF (8). However, studies based on DNA repair synthesis showed that removal of AAAF and UV lesions differed in the initial rate (9).The amount of excision repair of pyrimidine dimers saturates at high UV doses (>20 J-m-2 of 254 nm) (10-12). Hence, if AAAF truly mimicked UV damage one would expect that the amount of repair from a combined treatment using high doses would be less than the sum of the treatments separately. Therefore, we determined if the limited UV repair was affected by AAAF treatment. For this purpose we employed two techniques to monitor excision repair: unscheduled DNA synthesis (13) and the measurement of sites sensitive to UV-endonuclease (14). The first technique was chosen because it gives information of repair due to both agents, whereas the second, using Micrococcus luteus endonuclease, allows us to detect UVinduced pyrimidine dimers in the DNA of cells exposed to a combined treatment of UV and AAAF. We found, contrary to our expectation, that as a result of the combined treatment unscheduled DNA synthesis equaled the sum of those from separate treatments and that AAAF treatment did not inhibit the removal of sites sensitive to exogenous endonuclease.
MATERIALS AND METHODSCell Line and Tissue Culture. The normal human fibroblasts Rid Mor CRL 1220 were obtained from the Am...