Differences in School-Based Referrals for Mental Health Care: Understanding Racial/Ethnic Disparities Between Asian American and Latino Youth

Guo, Sisi; Kataoka, Sheryl H.; Bear, Laurel; Lau, Anna S.

doi:10.1007/s12310-013-9108-2

“…B. Lee, Han, Huh, Kim, & Kim, 2014; Ngo, Gibbons, Scire, & Le, 2014). Four studies focused on adolescents’ mental health service use (e.g., school-based mental health service use; Anyon et al, 2014; Bear et al, 2014; Brice et al, 2014; S. Guo et al, 2014), and the other studies focused on the service use of adults in different periods of adulthood ( n = 7; e.g., J.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2014.

Kim¹,

Shen²,

Hou³

et al. 2015

Asian American Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This 2014 review of Asian American psychology is the sixth review in the series. It includes 316 articles that met the inclusion criteria established by the past five annual reviews. Featured articles were derived from three sources: 137 were generated via the search term “Asian American” in PyscINFO, 111 were generated via a search for specific Asian American ethnic groups, and 32 were generated via author searches of articles that met the inclusion criteria. The top primary topic was health and health-related behaviors, the most frequently employed study design was cross-sectional, and the most studied Asian American ethnic group was Chinese. This year’s review includes information on the target population of the primary topic, the age range and developmental period of participants, and whether the study design was cross-sectional or longitudinal. It also identifies top authors and journals contributing to the 2014 annual review. These new features reveal that the most common target population of the primary topic was youths; studies most commonly included emerging adults ages 18–25; cross-sectional study design was employed more often than longitudinal design; the top contributor to the 2014 review was Stephen Chen, who authored the highest number of papers included; and the Asian American Journal of Psychology generated the highest number of publications for this review.

show abstract

“…Nguyen & Bornheimer, 2014); or they studied the extent of mental health service utilization among a specific Asian American ethnic group (H. B. Lee, Han, Huh, Kim, & Kim, 2014;Ngo, Gibbons, Scire, & Le, 2014). Four studies focused on adolescents' mental health service use (e.g., school-based mental health service use; Anyon et al, 2014;Bear et al, 2014;Brice et al, 2014;, and the other studies focused on the service use of adults in different periods of adulthood (n = 7; e.g., J. E. . All studies used cross-sectional designs and quantitative methods (e.g., analysis of variance, multiple regression, and logistic regression).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2013.

Wei¹,

Carrera²,

Li³

2014

Asian American Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This 2014 review of Asian American psychology is the sixth review in the series. It includes 316 articles that met the inclusion criteria established by the past five annual reviews. Featured articles were derived from three sources: 137 were generated via the search term "Asian American" in PyscINFO, 111 were generated via a search for specific Asian American ethnic groups, and 32 were generated via author searches of articles that met the inclusion criteria. The top primary topic was health and health-related behaviors, the most frequently employed study design was crosssectional, and the most studied Asian American ethnic group was Chinese. This year's review includes information on the target population of the primary topic, the age range and developmental period of participants, and whether the study design was cross-sectional or longitudinal. It also identifies top authors and journals contributing to the 2014 annual review. These new features reveal that the most common target population of the primary topic was Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to Su Yeong Kim, Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, 108 E Dean Keeton St., Stop A2702, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712. su.yeong.kim@utexas.edu. HHS Public Access Author manuscriptAsian Am J Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01. Published in final edited form as:Asian Am J Psychol. 2015 December ; 6(4): 291-332. doi:10.1037/aap0000031. Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript youths; studies most commonly included emerging adults ages 18-25; cross-sectional study design was employed more often than longitudinal design; the top contributor to the 2014 review was Stephen Chen, who authored the highest number of papers included; and the Asian American Journal of Psychology generated the highest number of publications for this review. Keywords review; Asian Americans, 2014The annual review of Asian American psychology facilitates a comprehensive, year-to-year understanding of the field by summarizing the major research topics and methodology used in Asian American psychology. Comparison of multiple annual reviews reveals past, current, and emerging trends. Illuminating these trends can be informative for new and experienced scholars alike, who can utilize the reviews to synthesize past and current research. This will help them identify emerging trends in order to plan future research that will make a meaningful contribution to scholarship on Asian American psychology. The present annual review uses the format established by the past five annual reviews, with the addition of new features for future annual reviews to consider. Like past reviews, the current issue presents major trends by primary topic, methodological design, and participant characteristics (e.g., average age and ethnicity). This review contributes a developmental perspective by including age range and developmental period in our categorization of participants, and by considering cross-...

show abstract

“…Several treatment barriers for Latino youth include cultural variations in problem recognition, attitudes towards mental health services, socioeconomic factors, lack of appropriate services (Cauce et al 2002), concerns about stigma (Merikangas et al 2011), and language issues (Garcia and Duckett 2009; Yeh et al 2003). Even in schools that offer on-site services, Latino youth, compared to non-Latino Whites, are still less likely to obtain treatment (Bear et al 2014; Guo et al 2014; Kim et al 2015). Other more accessible and less-stigmatized locations for providing treatment include primary care settings (Kelleher and Stevens 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stepped Care Interpersonal Psychotherapy Treatment for Depressed Adolescents: A Pilot Study in Pediatric Clinics

Mufson

¹

,

Rynn

²

,

Yanes‐Lukin

³

et al. 2017

Adm Policy Ment Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adolescents with depression are at risk for negative long-term consequences and recurrence of depression. Many do not receive nor access treatment, especially Latino youth. New treatment approaches are needed. This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a stepped collaborative care treatment model (SCIPT-A) for adolescents with depression utilizing interpersonal psychotherapy for adolescents (IPT-A) and antidepressant medication (if needed) compared to Enhanced Treatment as Usual (E-TAU) in urban pediatric primary care clinics serving primarily Latino youth. Results suggest the SCIPT-A model is feasible, acceptable and potentially beneficial for urban Latino adolescents. Clinicians delivered the SCIPT-A model with fidelity using supervision successfully implemented in a community setting.

show abstract

Differences in School-Based Referrals for Mental Health Care: Understanding Racial/Ethnic Disparities Between Asian American and Latino Youth

Cited by 74 publications

References 56 publications

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2014.

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2014.

Annual review of Asian American Psychology, 2013.

Stepped Care Interpersonal Psychotherapy Treatment for Depressed Adolescents: A Pilot Study in Pediatric Clinics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About