2012
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-02079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the mucosal surface barrier formed by mucin in the lower oviductal segments between laying and molting hens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protective role of MUC2 in innate host defense has been demonstrated in chickens (Horn et al, 2009; Jiang et al, 2013; Zhang et al, 2014). Ariyadi et al (2012) reported that the mRNA expression level of mucin is important for the formation of the mucosal barrier in the oviduct of laying hens, which is responsible for defensive functions that are essential for maintaining laying hens with good health during the laying phase. In the present study, supplementation with Thr significantly decreased the expression of MUC2 in the uterus of Chinese yellow-feathered broiler breeder hens ( P < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protective role of MUC2 in innate host defense has been demonstrated in chickens (Horn et al, 2009; Jiang et al, 2013; Zhang et al, 2014). Ariyadi et al (2012) reported that the mRNA expression level of mucin is important for the formation of the mucosal barrier in the oviduct of laying hens, which is responsible for defensive functions that are essential for maintaining laying hens with good health during the laying phase. In the present study, supplementation with Thr significantly decreased the expression of MUC2 in the uterus of Chinese yellow-feathered broiler breeder hens ( P < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moulting and heat stress are two distinct environmental challenges for laying hens. They both increase GC secretion and decrease egg production (Rozenboim et al., ; Sundaresan et al., ; Ariyadi et al., ), but the former will inevitably reduce circulating oestrogen (Berry, ; Meng et al., ), while the latter may have little impact within moderate limits (Franco‐Jimenez and Beck, ). These stressful conditions provide a research basis for determining the involvement of altered oestrogen level in GC‐sensitive regulation of OVA expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal of feed has been used most frequently in commercial poultry farms to induced molting in hens; however, this practice has come under criticism from animal welfare advocacy groups [6]. Furthermore, molting through feed withdrawal leads to greater susceptibility of hens to salmonella infection as compared to that for laying hens[7], [8]. Therefore, several alternative methods for inducing molting without starvation have been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%