2003
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the nestling begging calls of hosts and host-races of the common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no other study has examined parent-absent begging in a brood parasitic species under natural conditions, these results run counter to most studies of begging during provisioning events by brood parasites. Those studies have found that begging intensity during feeding events (e.g., time spent begging, begging posture) varied relative to hunger level (Butchart et al 2003;Hauber and Ramsey 2003;Lichtenstein and Dearborn 2004;Tanaka and Ueda 2005; but see Redondo 1993). Nevertheless, the results from the current study mirror begging during feeding visits from the same sample of nests (Rivers 2007) and match the general pattern that the begging intensity of cowbirds during parent-absent events was consistently higher than that of hosts of all sizes in this study in accordance with previous examinations of cowbird begging during feeding visits (Briskie et al 1994;Lichtenstein and Sealy 1998;Dearborn 1998;Glassey and Forbes 2003;Rivers 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no other study has examined parent-absent begging in a brood parasitic species under natural conditions, these results run counter to most studies of begging during provisioning events by brood parasites. Those studies have found that begging intensity during feeding events (e.g., time spent begging, begging posture) varied relative to hunger level (Butchart et al 2003;Hauber and Ramsey 2003;Lichtenstein and Dearborn 2004;Tanaka and Ueda 2005; but see Redondo 1993). Nevertheless, the results from the current study mirror begging during feeding visits from the same sample of nests (Rivers 2007) and match the general pattern that the begging intensity of cowbirds during parent-absent events was consistently higher than that of hosts of all sizes in this study in accordance with previous examinations of cowbird begging during feeding visits (Briskie et al 1994;Lichtenstein and Sealy 1998;Dearborn 1998;Glassey and Forbes 2003;Rivers 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This calling rate (90 syllables per 12 s) approximates the upper range of natural begging rates for reed warbler-cuckoos and the lower range for dunnockcuckoos of 4-6 days old (see fig. 4 of Butchart et al 2003). Playback cuts were looped so that they could be repeated if the begging bout lasted longer than 12 s.…”
Section: (B) Comparison With Naturally Raised Cuckoosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the linear, most rapid phase of nestling growth, energy is required mainly for tissue synthesis, while in the plateau phase of growth, energy is predominantly consumed by tissues functioning at high intensity (e.g., heart, kidney, liver; Vézina et al 2009). Moreover, older cuckoo nestlings beg more intensely (Butchart et al 2003), and begging is presumed to be an antioxidant-demanding activity (Helfenstein et al 2008, Noguera et al 2010, Boncoraglio et al 2012. Thus it is possible that the overall energy expenditure of cuckoo nestlings increases with age, which could elevate production of ROS to a rate higher than what their antioxidant system can eliminate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Great Reed Warbler is a well-known, relatively large cuckoo host, and cuckoo nestlings develop faster and reach a greater mass at fledging in nests of this species than in nests of smaller hosts (Kleven et al 1999, Butchart et al 2003. The eggs of the cuckoo and Great Reed Warbler differ in shape and shell thickness (Hargitai et al 2010, Igic et al 2011), but their volumes are similar (Honza et al 2001, Hargitai et al 2010.…”
Section: Methods Field Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation