1980
DOI: 10.1051/rphysap:019800015090142700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Différences observées dans l'alliage métallique amorphe Cu-Zr selon son mode d'élaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As displayed in Fig. 7(b), I defects ðqÞ shows an elliptic shape with strong in-plane correlation, and thus corresponds to small buried defects (like nanoporosity or density fluctuations in carbon) with an in-plane size of about 1 nm and an out-ofplane aspect ratio hHi=hDi>1; a porosity is often observed in sputtered samples [for instance, in metallic glasses prepared by sputtering, Flank et al (1980) observed a porosity by SAXS while spin-coated samples were homogeneous].…”
Section: áI Aumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As displayed in Fig. 7(b), I defects ðqÞ shows an elliptic shape with strong in-plane correlation, and thus corresponds to small buried defects (like nanoporosity or density fluctuations in carbon) with an in-plane size of about 1 nm and an out-ofplane aspect ratio hHi=hDi>1; a porosity is often observed in sputtered samples [for instance, in metallic glasses prepared by sputtering, Flank et al (1980) observed a porosity by SAXS while spin-coated samples were homogeneous].…”
Section: áI Aumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, Flank & Naudon (1977b) studied the same alloy and quenched it from 190°C to room temperature. The low quenching temperature slowed down the segregation rate.…”
Section: Quantitative Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%