2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different binarization processes validated against manual counts of fluorescent bacterial cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, all methods displayed strong agreement, presenting similar results. It was observed that there is no difference in the significance between the three types of analysis, and similar results to this study were demonstrated in the literature using different experimental conditions (Reyes‐Fernandez et al, 2019; Tamminga et al, 2016), confirming that the automated and semi‐automated method proposed can be used reliably.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, all methods displayed strong agreement, presenting similar results. It was observed that there is no difference in the significance between the three types of analysis, and similar results to this study were demonstrated in the literature using different experimental conditions (Reyes‐Fernandez et al, 2019; Tamminga et al, 2016), confirming that the automated and semi‐automated method proposed can be used reliably.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The limitations of the proposed automated method should be discussed. The global threshold for all images and the process of segmentation produce some issues, such as the loss of information (Kim et al, 2018; Reyes‐Fernandez et al, 2019; Tamminga et al, 2016). Therefore, it is necessary to conduct more studies on automatization applications in microscopic analysis for the improvement of segmentation tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method of cell density detection requires cells to be uniformly distributed in the liquid, and then to count the cells in certain volume of sample [11][12][13][14] . Commonly used methods for detecting cells are laser induced uorescence method [15][16][17][18][19] , image processing method [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and electrical impedance method [27][28][29][30] . Ivan V Grishagin designed a cell counting program based on image processing, which obtains images of mammalian cell suspension in the hemocytometer component through a conventional optical microscope equipped with a network camera [31] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples can either be directly analysed or in combination with staining methods for the detection of specific biomolecules or structures inside the cell. Examples of these well-known methods are Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation (FISH) or direct staining of DNA/ RNA using fluorescent labels like propidium iodide, acridine orange, Cyanine 3, or, Fluorescein isothiocyanate (Hoshino et al, 2008;Langendijk et al, 1995;Poulsen et al, 1993;Seo et al, 2010;Tamminga et al, 2016;Waters and Swedlow, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%