2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different variations in soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes and their responses to edaphic factors along a boreal secondary forest successional trajectory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forest soils exhibited net CH 4 uptake with the mean CH 4 fluxes ranging from −35.85 to −21.07 μg m −2 h −1 among three types of larch forest. This result is consistent with previous studies which suggest the larch forest soils show a net sink of atmospheric CH 4 in this study area (Wu et al, 2019;Duan et al, 2022). However, the capacity of soil net CH 4 uptake showed significant differences in RL, LL, and SLL.…”
Section: Effect Of Understory Species On Soil Ch 4 Fluxessupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The forest soils exhibited net CH 4 uptake with the mean CH 4 fluxes ranging from −35.85 to −21.07 μg m −2 h −1 among three types of larch forest. This result is consistent with previous studies which suggest the larch forest soils show a net sink of atmospheric CH 4 in this study area (Wu et al, 2019;Duan et al, 2022). However, the capacity of soil net CH 4 uptake showed significant differences in RL, LL, and SLL.…”
Section: Effect Of Understory Species On Soil Ch 4 Fluxessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Meanwhile, understory species can affect soil temperature and moisture by shading and its effect of evapotranspiration (Bond-Lamberty et al, 2011;Myers-Smith et al, 2011). Soil GHG fluxes are highly sensitive to soil temperature and moisture (Chen et al, 2021;Duan et al, 2022;Wang et al, 2022). However, the understory management experiments show that the effects of understory vegetation on soil temperature and moisture differ among understory species (Li et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, these results supported our second hypothesis. Previous studies have demonstrated inconsistent findings regarding the temporal variation in CH 4 fluxes, such as a unimodal pattern due to temperature rises, a bimodal pattern or no pronounced pattern as the joint effect of multiple factors [52,67]. We found soil CH 4 uptake showed a bimodal pattern during the study period (Figure 1c).…”
Section: Temporal Dependence Of Soil Ghg Fluxes On Soil Microbial Att...mentioning
confidence: 48%
“…+ oxidation [19]. We investigated the temporal variability of soil GHG fluxes and the influencing factors and quantified the soil GHG budgets within a growing season, similar to many other studies [67,69]. Notably, the roles of GHG fluxes during the dormant season are not negligible in their annual budget estimates according to previous evidence [70].…”
Section: Temporal Dependence Of Soil Ghg Fluxes On Soil Microbial Att...mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Thirdly, humidity is also considered to significantly affect GHG emissions over a longer period (e.g., seasonal and annual), and it is usually recorded in the form of rainfall [33,34]. However, the relationship between GHGs and humidity in a diurnal variation is rarely observed, and even if it is, a direct positive correlation has not been found in most cases due to the complex mechanisms of GHG emissions or the uncertainty of monitoring diurnal variations in soil humidity [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%