1999
DOI: 10.1238/physica.regular.059a00105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Cross Sections for H 2s–3s Excitation by Electron and Positron Impact

Abstract: Electron and positron impact di †erential cross sections for excitation of the 3s state of a hydrogen atom from its metastable 2s state are calculated in a distorted wave approximation at 10 and 50 eV. The e †ects of both adiabatic and non-adiabatic distortion of the atomic charge cloud by the incoming electron or positron are included in the initial and Ðnal state wavefunctions. Contrary to an earlier prediction, no dramatic di †erences between the electron and positron results are found.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Full optical potential (continuum optical potential plus positronium formation optical potential) (solid), continuum optical potential only (dotted) and pure close coupling (dashed) results are presented in (a). A comparison between the present CCOB results (solid), the results of Jha et al [8] (dashed), Deb et al [9] (dash dotted) and Kulhar [11] (dotted) is shown in (b). can be seen in figures 2(a) and 3(a), the effects of optical potentials become weak as the incident energy increases and they only cause a slight difference in the magnitude of cross sections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Full optical potential (continuum optical potential plus positronium formation optical potential) (solid), continuum optical potential only (dotted) and pure close coupling (dashed) results are presented in (a). A comparison between the present CCOB results (solid), the results of Jha et al [8] (dashed), Deb et al [9] (dash dotted) and Kulhar [11] (dotted) is shown in (b). can be seen in figures 2(a) and 3(a), the effects of optical potentials become weak as the incident energy increases and they only cause a slight difference in the magnitude of cross sections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The results of Jha et al [8] showed sharp dips in the curves of the differential cross section for both energies, while Kulhar [11] obtained shallow minima at different scattering angles. There was no dip in the results of Deb et al [9] and Ghoshal and Mandal [10]. Polarization potentials were taken into account in the calculation of the incoming wavefunction in the work of Deb et al [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations