Differential diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease using structural MRI cortical thickness, hippocampal shape, hippocampal texture, and volumetry

Abstract

This paper presents a brain T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarker that combines several individual MRI biomarkers (cortical thickness measurements, volumetric measurements, hippocampal shape, and hippocampal texture). The method was developed, trained, and evaluated using two publicly available reference datasets: a standardized dataset from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and the imaging arm of the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle flagship study of ageing (AIBL). In addition, the method was evaluated by participation in the Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Dementia (CADDementia) challenge. Cross-validation using ADNI and AIBL data resulted in a multi-class classification accuracy of 62.7% for the discrimination of healthy normal controls (NC), subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). This performance generalized to the CADDementia challenge where the method, trained using the ADNI and AIBL data, achieved a classification accuracy 63.0%. The obtained classification accuracy resulted in a first place in the challenge, and the method was significantly better (McNemar's test) than the bottom 24 methods out of the total of 29 methods contributed by 15 different teams in the challenge. The method was further investigated with learning curve and feature selection experiments using ADNI and AIBL data. The learning curve experiments suggested that neither more training data nor a more complex classifier would have improved the obtained results. The feature selection experiment showed that both common and uncommon individual MRI biomarkers contributed to the performance; hippocampal volume, ventricular volume, hippocampal texture, and parietal lobe thickness were the most important. This study highlights the need for both subtle, localized measurements and global measurements in order to discriminate NC, MCI, and AD simultaneously based on a single structural MRI scan. It is likely that additional non-structural MRI features are needed to further improve the obtained performance, especially to improve the discrimination between NC and MCI.

Recovery from Proactive Semantic Interference and MRI Volume: A Replication and Extension Study

“…Interestingly, HVLT-R total recall and NACC delayed recall for a passage were uniquely related to decreased CoTH in the superior parietal regions. There is increasing recognition that volumetric measures may differ from measures of CoTH in relationship to cognitive processes [24, 25], and our findings indicate that this is an area worthy of further research.…”

Classifying cognitive impairment based on the spatial heterogeneity of cerebral blood flow images

“…25 Another study reported 62.7% accuracy in classification of CU, MCI, and AD using anatomical features that included hippocampal shape, texture, and cortical thickness. 29 A whole-brain hierarchical network analysis of >700 brain images showed accuracy of CU vs. MCI: 84%; CU vs. AD: 94%; MCI vs.…”

Corticospinal tract degeneration in ALS unmasked in T1‐weighted images using texture analysis

“…Texture analysis is a statistical method of quantifying gray‐level intensity and patterns in an image that the human eye cannot detect. Studies have applied texture analysis in conventional MR images to characterize and diagnose various neurological diseases including brain tumors and Alzheimer's disease (Kickingereder et al, ; Sørensen et al, ). A novel three‐dimensional (3D) voxel‐wise texture analysis method also revealed the spatial pattern of pathology involving the medial temporal lobes in Alzheimer's disease in a hypothesis‐free study (Maani, Yang, & Kalra, ).…”