2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential diffusion effects inclusion with flamelet generated manifold for the modeling of stratified premixed cooled flames

Abstract: DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thereby, the complexity of the modelling is significantly reduced at the cost of neglecting the minor effects of differential diffusion. As recently demonstrated by Donini et al [30], the influence of differential diffusion in the modelling of laminar methane flames is negligibly small. In a turbulent framework, the diffusion processes are governed by turbulent diffusion and the influence of the Lewis number assumption is even lower.…”
Section: One-dimensional Laminar Premixed Flamementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Thereby, the complexity of the modelling is significantly reduced at the cost of neglecting the minor effects of differential diffusion. As recently demonstrated by Donini et al [30], the influence of differential diffusion in the modelling of laminar methane flames is negligibly small. In a turbulent framework, the diffusion processes are governed by turbulent diffusion and the influence of the Lewis number assumption is even lower.…”
Section: One-dimensional Laminar Premixed Flamementioning
confidence: 76%
“…A key advantage of FGM is in fact the capability to predict minor species in a consistent way [4]. The FGM technique has proven to be very accurate for laminar premixed Bunsen flames including heat loss presence [3, 45, 46], preferential diffusive effects [47], highly stretched premixed counter-flow flames [5] and confined triple flames [6]. This technique performed well also in DNS of a turbulent expanding flame [48], showing that a single control variable can give accurate predictions on the local mass burning rate.…”
Section: Combustion Modeling: the Flamelet-generated Manifold Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereby, the minor effects of differential diffusion are neglected reducing significantly the complexity of the modeling. As demonstrated by Donini et al [23], the influence of differential diffusion in the modeling of laminar methane flames is negligibly small. In a turbulent flame, the diffusion processes are dominated by turbulent diffusion and the influence of the Lewis number assumption is further reduced.…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%