2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2003.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects in cells exposed to ultra-short, high intensity electric fields: cell survival, DNA damage, and cell cycle analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
137
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
137
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They could also arise due to the interference of high electric fields generated by nuclear envelope charging with nuclear function, resulting in AO intercalation changes in DNA [5]. In other studies, nsPEFs induced DNA damage that was most likely a direct effect of the pulses [13] and affected cell survival, clearly indicating that they can affect the nuclear structures [5,13]. However, it remains unknown whether nsPEFs might affect other charged nuclear functional substructures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They could also arise due to the interference of high electric fields generated by nuclear envelope charging with nuclear function, resulting in AO intercalation changes in DNA [5]. In other studies, nsPEFs induced DNA damage that was most likely a direct effect of the pulses [13] and affected cell survival, clearly indicating that they can affect the nuclear structures [5,13]. However, it remains unknown whether nsPEFs might affect other charged nuclear functional substructures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, it remains unknown whether nsPEFs might affect other charged nuclear functional substructures. Since DNA is a heavily charged intracellular component whose folded spiral structures are distributed close to the nuclear envelope, we postulated that it may be susceptible to nsPEFs [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(1) Using a comet assay, Stacey et al [24] found that ten 60 ns pulses of 60 kV/cm caused a rapid 2.6-fold increase in the mean image length of DNA electrophoresis tracks in Jurkat cell extracts and a 1.6-fold increase in the comet assay from HL60 cell extracts. In both cases, this was a very significant change (p < 0.001).…”
Section: Previously Reported Changes In Dna Post-nspefmentioning
confidence: 99%