2009
DOI: 10.1152/jn.91295.2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Effects of Cognitive Demand on Human Cortical Activation Associated With Vibrotactile Stimulation

Abstract: This event-related functional MRI study examines the neural correlates of vibrotactile sensation within the context of different psychophysical demands. Nine subjects received vibrotactile stimuli on the right volar forearm during detection, localization, and passive tasks. In the detection task, subjects indicated the offset (end) of each stimulus by pressing a response key with their left hand. In the localization task, subjects identified the location of the stimulus ("distal?" or "proximal?") by pressing t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The amygdala plays a critical role in learning the association between aversive and neutral stimuli in classical conditioning 41, and amygdala activation in response to what should be an affectively neutral stimulus could be consistent with the hypothesis proposed by Apkarian that chronic pain is a state of continuous learning in which aversive associations are continuously made with incidental events, like innocuous tactile stimulation, due to the persistent presence of pain 3. Drawing conclusions about the emotional implications of amygdala activation is beyond the scope of this study, and given the association between TMD and hypervigilance58, we must also recognize the possible influence of attentional differences on processing in the insula2 and ACC71. However, the expectation of pain has been shown to increase the BOLD response evoked by nonpainful stimulation in the insula and ACC 59, and similar to the dissociation of group activations we observed within SI and SII, the subregion of the insula in which our TMD group showed maximal activity reportedly responds to noxious but not to innocuous stimuli 50.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The amygdala plays a critical role in learning the association between aversive and neutral stimuli in classical conditioning 41, and amygdala activation in response to what should be an affectively neutral stimulus could be consistent with the hypothesis proposed by Apkarian that chronic pain is a state of continuous learning in which aversive associations are continuously made with incidental events, like innocuous tactile stimulation, due to the persistent presence of pain 3. Drawing conclusions about the emotional implications of amygdala activation is beyond the scope of this study, and given the association between TMD and hypervigilance58, we must also recognize the possible influence of attentional differences on processing in the insula2 and ACC71. However, the expectation of pain has been shown to increase the BOLD response evoked by nonpainful stimulation in the insula and ACC 59, and similar to the dissociation of group activations we observed within SI and SII, the subregion of the insula in which our TMD group showed maximal activity reportedly responds to noxious but not to innocuous stimuli 50.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Higher cognitive demands could lead to generally higher activation levels (Albanese, Duerden, Bohotin, Rainville, & Duncan, 2009) which might explain that we found activations in the shape versus roughness task but not vice versa. Higher cognitive demands could lead to generally higher activation levels (Albanese, Duerden, Bohotin, Rainville, & Duncan, 2009) which might explain that we found activations in the shape versus roughness task but not vice versa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…And as is true for visual processing, effects of attention can be seen at the level of BOLD fMRI responses evoked by somatosensory stimuli, within primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (Albanese et al, 2009; Chen et al, 2010; Johanson-Berg et al, 2000; Schubert et al, 2008; Sterr et al, 2007). These changes are specific to areas of the somatotopic cortical map corresponding to the attended part of the body (for human studies, usually the right or left hand).…”
Section: Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%