2018
DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoy093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of internal tagging depending on depth treatment in Atlantic salmon: a cautionary tale for aquatic animal tag use

Abstract: Electronic tags are widespread tools for studying aquatic animal behavior; however, tags risk behavioral manipulation and negative welfare outcomes. During an experiment to test behavioral differences of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar in different aquaculture cage types, including ones expected to elicit deeper swimming behavior, we found negative tagging effects depending on whether cages were depth-modified. In the experiment, data storage tags implanted in Atlantic salmon tracked their depth behavior and survi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, caution is still warranted when interpreting data obtained from implanted bio‐loggers. For instance, swimming behaviours in relation to depth preference have recently been shown to be altered in Atlantic salmon owing to the bio‐loggers reducing maximum depth where neutral buoyancy can be maintained (Wright et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, caution is still warranted when interpreting data obtained from implanted bio‐loggers. For instance, swimming behaviours in relation to depth preference have recently been shown to be altered in Atlantic salmon owing to the bio‐loggers reducing maximum depth where neutral buoyancy can be maintained (Wright et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish physiology studies have traditionally been performed in confined and controlled laboratory conditions where measurements of fish in experimental setups often are time restricted owing to various practical reasons, or they only reflect a momentary snapshot of the physiological status such as when analysing blood samples. Nonetheless, downsizing and commercialization of bio‐logging technologies have now made it easier to obtain continuous measurements on fish swimming freely in their ambient environment for extended periods of time (Brijs et al ., 2018; Wright et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, this means that the selection of sh should be truly random and representative, and that the tags do not in uence physiology or behaviour in such a way that the tagged sh differ signi cantly from untagged sh (e.g. Wright et al, 2018). In addition, tagging procedures include several steps (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, this means that the selection of fish should be truly random and representative, and that the tags do not influence physiology or behaviour in such a way that the tagged fish differ significantly from untagged fish (e.g. Wright et al, 2018). In addition, tagging procedures include several operations (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%