2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-007-0701-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of modafinil and methylphenidate on stop-signal reaction time task performance in the rat, and interactions with the dopamine receptor antagonist cis-flupenthixol

Abstract: This evidence supports a hypothesis that stop and go processes are under control of distinct neurochemical mechanisms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

23
149
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(72 reference statements)
23
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mixed D1/D2 receptor antagonist, cis-flupenthixol, had no effect on action cancellation, but perhaps more critically, it did not influence the SSRT-decreasing effects of methylphenidate and modafinil at doses that significantly increased the GoRT (Eagle et al 2007). This is perhaps the most convincing evidence to date that D1 and D2 receptors play little role in the mediation of SSRT.…”
Section: Action Cancellationmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The mixed D1/D2 receptor antagonist, cis-flupenthixol, had no effect on action cancellation, but perhaps more critically, it did not influence the SSRT-decreasing effects of methylphenidate and modafinil at doses that significantly increased the GoRT (Eagle et al 2007). This is perhaps the most convincing evidence to date that D1 and D2 receptors play little role in the mediation of SSRT.…”
Section: Action Cancellationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In both humans and rodents, Damphetamine decreased SSRT only when subjects had relatively slow baseline SSRT (de Wit et al 2000;Feola et al 2000). Similar effects can be seen for methylphenidate (Boonstra et al 2005;Eagle et al 2007), and modafinil in both human and rat (Eagle et al 2007;Turner personal communication). Baseline-dependent psychostimulant action was also found in a rodent study within which the SSRT was artificially manipulated (rather than the natural within-population variability considered above).…”
Section: Evidence For Baseline Dependence Of Psychostimulant Actionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations