2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2014.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of social influence sources on self-reported music piracy

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe paper examines the effects of five major socialization agents-namely parents, peers, traditional media, the Internet, and music industry-on emerging adults' attitudes and behavior toward music piracy in the form of unauthorized downloading. Based upon self-reported behavior, our study shows that these socialization agents exert differential effects on music piracy. Specifically, peers and the Internet exert direct impact on both attitudes and behavior. Parents and music industry, however, on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present investigation thus contributes to extant knowledge on consumer socialization by examining the role that BRUGC plays in consumer decision making. Second, the current effort extends prior empiricism on user-generated content by considering both the generation and sharing of BRUGC (Yang and Wang, 2015). Third, previous studies have found that individual motivations influence brand-related activities on social media (De Vries et al, 2017;Hollebeek and Macky, 2019); to augment understanding of consumer motivations to engage in BRUGC on social media, the present undertaking extends that work by considering demographic and behavioral factors, along with individual motivations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The present investigation thus contributes to extant knowledge on consumer socialization by examining the role that BRUGC plays in consumer decision making. Second, the current effort extends prior empiricism on user-generated content by considering both the generation and sharing of BRUGC (Yang and Wang, 2015). Third, previous studies have found that individual motivations influence brand-related activities on social media (De Vries et al, 2017;Hollebeek and Macky, 2019); to augment understanding of consumer motivations to engage in BRUGC on social media, the present undertaking extends that work by considering demographic and behavioral factors, along with individual motivations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…An individual's family and friends may play an important role in piracy behaviors. Previous studies have found support for the influence of subjective norms on intentions to engage in software and music piracy (Higgins et al, 2005;Hsu and Shiue, 2008;Yang and Wang, 2014). Lau (2003) argues that there is a social acceptance of software piracy which promotes or influences lenient attitudes toward piracy behaviors.…”
Section: Subjective Normsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors that drive digital piracy, the conditions that facilitate it, and the manner in which it can be addressed are complex. The criminology perspective suggests that deterrence [79], [102], [105], [134], [141], neutralization [49], self-control [43], [46], [71], and social learning [77], [137] influence digital piracy. Observing and interacting for long periods of time with peers who pirate content [71], [105], having an innate lack of self-control [27], [44], [45], [71], prior downloading experience [45], [117], and rationalizing the behavior through the denial of harm and other negative consequences [49] also influence digital pirating behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%