1975
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2964(75)90075-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of two chemotherapeutic agents, streptozotocin and chlorozotocin, on the mammalian cell cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
2
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, this could indicate a cell cycle block during the late S or G 2 phase of the cell cycle, which prevents cells from progressing through mitosis and reentering the G 1 phase, producing a reduction in G 1 cells when the cohort moves through the S phase. Similar events have been demonstrated following treatment with a wide range of apoptosis‐inducing agents [38–42]. Further evidence for the G 1 and S phase selectivity of ditelluride and telluranthrene is shown in Figures 4 and 5, which indicate that when apoptotic cells become apparent, the G 1 and S phases of the cell cycle are reduced, implying that cells within these two phases are preferentially being induced to enter apoptosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, this could indicate a cell cycle block during the late S or G 2 phase of the cell cycle, which prevents cells from progressing through mitosis and reentering the G 1 phase, producing a reduction in G 1 cells when the cohort moves through the S phase. Similar events have been demonstrated following treatment with a wide range of apoptosis‐inducing agents [38–42]. Further evidence for the G 1 and S phase selectivity of ditelluride and telluranthrene is shown in Figures 4 and 5, which indicate that when apoptotic cells become apparent, the G 1 and S phases of the cell cycle are reduced, implying that cells within these two phases are preferentially being induced to enter apoptosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Cells present within the S phase or those entering the S phase from the G 1 phase are induced to undergo apoptotic cell death, and no repopulation of the G 1 phase of the cell cycle occurs because of the block in the G 2 phase. Similar dose‐dependent induction of apoptosis in conjunction with a cell cycle block has been demonstrated for numerous, effective chemotherapeutic agents [39,41,42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Alternatively, this could indicate a cell cycle block during the late S or G 2 phase of the cell cycle, which prevents cells from progressing through mitosis and reentering the G 1 phase, producing a reduction in G 1 cells when the cohort moves through the S phase. Similar events have been demonstrated following treatment with a wide range of apoptosis-inducing agents [38][39][40][41][42]. Further evidence for the G 1 and S phase selectivity of ditelluride and telluranthrene is shown in Figures 4 and 5, which indicate that when apoptotic cells become apparent, the G 1 and S phases of the cell cycle are reduced, implying that cells within these two phases are preferentially being induced to enter apoptosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Cells present within the S phase or those entering the S phase from the G 1 phase are induced to undergo apoptotic cell death, and no repopulation of the G 1 phase of the cell cycle occurs because of the block in the G 2 phase. Similar dose-dependent induction of apoptosis in conjunction with a cell cycle block has been demonstrated for numerous, effective chemotherapeutic agents [39,41,42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…However, in the course of recent years, evidence has been collected that, in some situations, the non-proliferating cells may reveal an even greater sensitivity to drugs than proliferating cells Humphrey, 1973, 1975;Twentyman and Bleehen, 1973;Hahn, Gordon and Kurkjian, 1974;Sutherland, 1974;Tobey, Oka and Crissman, 1975; see also Marsh, 1976, for review). Although some of the results appear to be conflicting, there is no doubt at present that, at least under certain conditions, the non-proliferating cells may be severely damaged by concentrations of drugs less toxic to the proliferating cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%