1987
DOI: 10.1177/35.2.2878952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential immunolabeling for electron microscopy of diverse peptidergic neurons.

Abstract: We describe a simple and reliable method for differential immunolabeling of pre- and post-synaptic signal peptides at the ultrastructural level. Hypothalamic tissues of rats, including the suprachiasmatic nucleus, were cut on a Vibratome. Visualization of the immunolabeling of somatostatin (SRIH) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) was performed with avidin-biotin-peroxidase-diaminobenzidine (DAB). The end product of the DAB to VIP was further silver-intensified in a physical processing using silver ni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations suggest that VIP-L1 neurons receive various inputs and project to both subdivisions of the SCN, while GRP-LI neurons receive restricted inputs and project mainly to the ventrolateral SCN. Indeed, from electron microscopic studies, VIP-L1 neurons in the SCN receive several kinds of inputs from neurons immunoreactive for SS (Maegawa et al, 1987), 5-HT (Hisano et al, 1988a), and NPY (Hisano et al, 1988b). Thus, it could be speculated that light suppressed VIP-L1 levels in the SCN because visual information was integrated on the VIP neurons with several inhibitory signals, such as SS (Koch and Schonbrunn, 1984), NPY (Shibata and Moore, 1988), and 5-HT (Meijer and Groos, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations suggest that VIP-L1 neurons receive various inputs and project to both subdivisions of the SCN, while GRP-LI neurons receive restricted inputs and project mainly to the ventrolateral SCN. Indeed, from electron microscopic studies, VIP-L1 neurons in the SCN receive several kinds of inputs from neurons immunoreactive for SS (Maegawa et al, 1987), 5-HT (Hisano et al, 1988a), and NPY (Hisano et al, 1988b). Thus, it could be speculated that light suppressed VIP-L1 levels in the SCN because visual information was integrated on the VIP neurons with several inhibitory signals, such as SS (Koch and Schonbrunn, 1984), NPY (Shibata and Moore, 1988), and 5-HT (Meijer and Groos, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animals were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection o f sodium pentobarbital (40-50 m g/kg body weight) and perfused via the ascending aorta with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) (pH 7.4) followed by a fixative consisted of 4% paraformal dehyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde and 0.2% picric acid in 320 mosm PB(pH 7.4). The hypothalami were dissected out and immersed in the same fixative for 1 2 -18 h at 4 ° C. Frontal sections were cut at 30-40 pm on a Vibratome (Oxford instrument, USA) and processed for the double labeling procedure [17], Sections were first treated with 0.2% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4) for I h at room temperature, and then the following procedures were carried out: (1) incubation in anti-SP serum diluted 1:2.000 for 3 h at 18 °C; (2) biotin ylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Vector Laboratory, Burlingame, Calif., di luted 1:100) for 1.5 h at 18 °C ; (3) avidin-biotin peroxidase complex (ABC, Vector, mixing 45 pi of both avidin and biotin peroxidase in 5 ml of 0 .1 M PB, pH 7.4) (4) visualization with the solution consisted of 1.5 mg of 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) and 20 pi of 3% hydrogen peroxide in 20 ml PBS: this gave a brown immunoreaction product for SP; (5) incubation in anti-LHRH serum diluted 1:1,000 or in anti-gonadotrophic hormone-releasing hormone-asso ciated peptide (GAP) serum diluted 1:5,000 for 12-18 h at 18 °C; (6) biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG diluted 1:100 for 12-14 h at 18 0 C: (7) silver-gold intensification of the DAB chromogen for SP [17]; (8) ABC for 12-14 h at 18 °C ; (9) visualization o f the immunoreaction for LHRH or GAP with DAB chromogen. The sections were mounted on glass slides coated with albumin, sealed with balsam, and examined histologically.…”
Section: Double Immunolabelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the combined pre-and pre-embedding method, both the first and second labelings are done on the coronal sections cut at 30 to 60 p. m thickness on a Vibratome. Two antigens are distinguished at the electron microscopic level by gold or ferritin particles and DAB reaction products, respectively (Leranth et al, 1985;Maegawa et al, 1987;Van den Pol et al, 1985), and DAB reaction products and tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) reaction products, respectively (Norgren and Lehman, 1989). Both DAB and TMB are peroxidase-mediated products, but the ultrastructural appearance of TMB reaction products is visibly different from that of DAB (Norgren and Lehman, 1989).…”
Section: Non-embedding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the application of double labeling on the same section (Table 3), the post-embedding method using colloidal gold particles of different sizes appears superior to other methods, chiefly because of its simple methodology and applicability to the routinely processed resin-embedded tissues (Bendayan, 1982). Double labeling procedures by the pre-embedding method (Maegawa et al, 1987) or by the combination of the preand post-embedding methods (Vila-Porcile et al, 1987) have been developed, but they seem more complicated technically than the colloidal gold post-embedding double labeling method.…”
Section: Pre-embedding Post-embedding Non-embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%