2021
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential influence of antibiotic therapy and other medications on oncological outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab versus cytotoxic chemotherapy

Abstract: BackgroundSome concomitant medications including antibiotics (ATB) have been reproducibly associated with worse survival following immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in unselected patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (according to programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and treatment line). Whether such relationship is causative or associative is matter of debate.MethodsWe present the outcomes analysis according to concomitant baseline medications (prior to ICI initiation) with putative immun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
94
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
94
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We noticed differences between cancer types, with a negative impact of several co-medications only observed in melanoma patients highly represented in our cohort. Therefore, focusing on one cancer type with a multicentric design or unplanned pooled post hoc analyses of clinical trials are of interest [41,42]. One may also consider that currently ICI are more often prescribed as first-line treatment, notably in lung cancer patients (only 9 of 150 patients in our cohort), and that previous systemic treatments may represent an additional bias in the interpretation of our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We noticed differences between cancer types, with a negative impact of several co-medications only observed in melanoma patients highly represented in our cohort. Therefore, focusing on one cancer type with a multicentric design or unplanned pooled post hoc analyses of clinical trials are of interest [41,42]. One may also consider that currently ICI are more often prescribed as first-line treatment, notably in lung cancer patients (only 9 of 150 patients in our cohort), and that previous systemic treatments may represent an additional bias in the interpretation of our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the difference in OS between the LIPI good group and LIPI intermediate/poor group is more convincing. In addition, although multivariate analysis took many factors into consideration, other factors not included in the analysis, such as PD-L1, TMB and antibiotic therapy (41), may also affect the final results. We further conducted a subgroup analysis by patients' characteristics, and the results indicated that the LIPI good group had better PFS and OS than the LIPI intermediate/ poor group, especially in subgroups of males, smokers, those with ED, those receiving PD-1 inhibitor treatment, and those with liver metastasis, which revealed that the pretreatment LIPI might be prognostic only for specific subgroups of SCLC patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3–6 Cortellini et al further demonstrated that negative impact of antibiotics on ICIs monotherapy but not chemotherapy might be as a result of their underlying immune-modulatory effect, while the effects of corticosteroids and PPIs on clinical outcomes might be driven by adverse disease features. 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%