2009
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.129
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential MSH2 promoter methylation in blood cells of Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients

Abstract: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is caused by NF1 gene mutations. The phenotype is highly variable, with 'modifiers' being discussed as potential determinants. Mismatch repair deficiency was shown to cause NF1 mutations, but constitutional mutation of mismatch repair genes was identified only once in a NF1 patient. We aimed to analyze whether DNA methylation of mismatch repair gene promoters, known to lead to transcriptional silencing, is associated with increased tumor load in NF1 defined by the number of cutan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, apart from one report, no constitutional mutations in MMR genes have been detected in NF1 patients 44. A recent study examined whether increased tumour load in NF1 (higher number of cutaneous neurofibromas) was associated with methylation of MMR genes 45. Titze et al performed methylation-specific PCR and pyrosequencing of MMR gene promoters most frequently involved in human cancers ( MLH1 , MSH6 , PMS2 , and MSH2 ) in leukocytes of NF1 patients.…”
Section: Biology-driven Candidate Gene Strategy To Identify Modifier mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, apart from one report, no constitutional mutations in MMR genes have been detected in NF1 patients 44. A recent study examined whether increased tumour load in NF1 (higher number of cutaneous neurofibromas) was associated with methylation of MMR genes 45. Titze et al performed methylation-specific PCR and pyrosequencing of MMR gene promoters most frequently involved in human cancers ( MLH1 , MSH6 , PMS2 , and MSH2 ) in leukocytes of NF1 patients.…”
Section: Biology-driven Candidate Gene Strategy To Identify Modifier mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, few studies have assessed the DNAm state of MPNSTs, and most of those have been restricted to the NF1 gene itself (Harder et al 2004) or selected CGIs and promoters (Gonzalez-Gomez et al 2003). Nevertheless, these studies have identified differential DNAm of several genes thought to be involved in MPNST development and progression, including CDKN2A and MSH2 Titze et al 2010). To provide a more comprehensive catalog of DNAm differences in MPNST, we performed unbiased methylome analysis of benign and malignant NF samples as well as controls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported the association of DNA methylation of the NOD2 promoter with patient’s age and disease status (Fernandez et al, 2011; Kerkel et al, 2010). Studies on various diseases have shown that differential promoter specific DNA methylation plays a critical role in expression variation between two alleles (Gonsky et al, 2009; Grayson et al, 2005; Movassagh et al, 2010; Titze et al, 2009). Therefore, a possible mechanism for the variation in AI of NOD2 and ATG16L1 is that it results from differences in gene expression between alleles with differential DNA promoter-specific methylation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%