2017
DOI: 10.1109/tifs.2016.2632069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Private Data Collection and Analysis Based on Randomized Multiple Dummies for Untrusted Mobile Crowdsensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies have recently been made on LPDE (e.g., [3,17,25,30,31,37,40,44]), mainly from the perspective of privacy metrics, obfuscation mechanisms, and statistical inference methods. A representative privacy metric in the local model is LDP (Local Differential Privacy) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have recently been made on LPDE (e.g., [3,17,25,30,31,37,40,44]), mainly from the perspective of privacy metrics, obfuscation mechanisms, and statistical inference methods. A representative privacy metric in the local model is LDP (Local Differential Privacy) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been considerable research into the implementation of privacy-based MC algorithms. In [20], Yuichi Sei et al proposed a new anonymized datacollection scheme that can estimate data distributions more accurately. They prove that their proposed method can reduce the mean squared error and the Jensen-Shannon divergence compared with other existing studies [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], Yuichi Sei et al proposed a new anonymized datacollection scheme that can estimate data distributions more accurately. They prove that their proposed method can reduce the mean squared error and the Jensen-Shannon divergence compared with other existing studies [20]. In [17], Jian Lin et al proposed the BidGuard scheme for privacy-preserving MC incentive mechanisms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under the data collection scenario of single binary attribute and multiple polychotomous attributes, Wang et al studied the relationship between Laplace mechanism and RR by comparing their theoretical utility error and showing the ε ‐differential privacy satisfaction results of RR. Sei and Ohsuga proposed the protocols S2 M and S2Mb, which require less number of samples in estimation, to achieve the privacy‐preserving mobile crowdsensing. Holohan et al presented a systematic study on the optimality of RR in the context of strict and relaxed DP, especially for binary outputs.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%