1974
DOI: 10.1038/248796a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential survival of skin and heart allografts in radiation chimaeras provides further evidence for Sk histocompatibility antigen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
27
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other animal tested in the same way showed permanent donor skin survival. These data are consistent with what is known about skin-specific antigens in mice (52)(53)(54). Because it is likely that only a few alleles for such skin-specific anti-gens exist within our swine herd, some animals could be expected to share common alleles by chance, and therefore a certain percentage of chimeric animals might be expected to accept skin grafts, whereas others would reject.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The other animal tested in the same way showed permanent donor skin survival. These data are consistent with what is known about skin-specific antigens in mice (52)(53)(54). Because it is likely that only a few alleles for such skin-specific anti-gens exist within our swine herd, some animals could be expected to share common alleles by chance, and therefore a certain percentage of chimeric animals might be expected to accept skin grafts, whereas others would reject.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Heart allograft integrity, however, was never compromised in chimeric recipients with chronic skin graft rejection, suggesting lack of cross-reactivity between skin and heart Ags. Similar conclusions were drawn from earlier studies that compared heart and skin graft survival in radiation chimeras, although histological screening for heart arteriopathy was not reported (35). Although a short 2-day interval between BMTx and skin Tx substantially delayed or prevented chronic rejection, it did not achieve complete protection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Although only ϳ5% of all skin allografts transplanted 3 mo after BMTx were also protected from chronic rejection, early studies by Steinmuller and Lofgreen (35) suggested that heart allografts may not pose the same problems of tissue-specific Ags as observed for skin grafts. While our experiments were ongoing, one study reported protection from acute but not from chronic heart graft rejection by established chimeras (36), whereas in another system both acute and chronic heart allograft rejection were prevented by BMTx, albeit with a protocol that included costimulation blockade beyond chimerism induction at the time of heart Tx (37).…”
Section: Stable Hemopoietic Chimerism Prevents Chronic Heart Allografmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why did T cell-deficient BMT recipients reject skin grafts, but not chimeric donor cells, while wtB6/6.5Gy BMT recipients rejected both skin grafts and chimeric cells? Involvement of skin-specific Ag (18,19) was ruled out as cause of skin graft rejection because the degree of in vivo proliferation correlated well with specific skin allograft survival and adoptive transfer of wt donor T cells alone without exposure to skin Ag-restored tolerance to skin allografts. In vivo MLR showed that the responder frequency of donor-reactive CD4 ϩ T cells was smaller in T cell-deficient BMT recipients than that in wtB6/6.5Gy BMT recipients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%