2007
DOI: 10.1109/tcapt.2007.906349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Temperature Sensors Fully Compatible With a 0.35-$\mu$m CMOS Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Seebeck effect is also applicable to other combinations of metals (or alloys) nonspecified in these standards. For example, thermocouples can be implemented with materials commonly employed in CMOS technology, thus resulting in an on-chip non-standard thermocouple [39].…”
Section: B Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Seebeck effect is also applicable to other combinations of metals (or alloys) nonspecified in these standards. For example, thermocouples can be implemented with materials commonly employed in CMOS technology, thus resulting in an on-chip non-standard thermocouple [39].…”
Section: B Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various temperature sensors including thermocouples [40,66,67], infrared detectors, thermal-resistance [68,69,70] devices and thermistors [71,72,73] were investigated in the sense of the programmability, interfacing capability, accuracy, precision, and temperature range suitability for HVAC applications. Thermal sensors have issues with thermal distribution that is based on physical dimensions and shapes.…”
Section: The Temperature Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous on-chip active sensors for differential temperature measurements [23], two temperature-sensing parasitic PNP devices were placed as a differential pair within an operational transconductance amplifier configuration. This sensor design approach yields a high sensitivity of up to 400 mV/mW [sensor output voltage/CUT power dissipation], but a drawback is the limited dynamic range of less than 1.5 mW with this sensitivity.…”
Section: A State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sensor design approach yields a high sensitivity of up to 400 mV/mW [sensor output voltage/CUT power dissipation], but a drawback is the limited dynamic range of less than 1.5 mW with this sensitivity. Generally, such differential sensors are optimal for the heterodyne approach ( [12], [13]) and the ac setup at low frequencies ( [23]) with external lock-in amplifier or spectrum analyzer, where the low-power products at do not saturate the sensor.…”
Section: A State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%