Differentially Private Non-parametric Machine Learning as a Service

Dandekar, Ashish; Basu, Debabrota; Bressan, Stéphane

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-27615-7_14

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The effects of water temperature are more important than the effect of ambient temperature in temperature distribution of the dam across the thickness, emphasising how critical water temperatures are to the behaviour of arch dams [14].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Predicting the Effects of Climate Change on Water Temperatures of Roode Elsberg Dam Using Nonparametric Machine Learning Models

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A nonparametric machine learning model was used to study the behaviour of the variables of a concrete arch dam: Roode Elsberg dam. The variables used were ambient temperature, water temperatures, and water level. Water temperature was measured using twelve thermometers; six thermometers were on each flank of the dam. The thermometers were placed in pairs on different levels: avg6 (avg6-R and avg6-L) and avg5 (avg5-R and avg5-L) were on level 47.43 m, avg4 (avg4-R and avg4-L) and avg3 (avg3-R and avg3-L) were on level 43.62 m, and avg2 (avg2-R and avg2-L) and avg1 (avg1-R and avg1-L) were on level 26.23 m. Four neural networks and four random forests were cross-validated to determine their best-performing hyperparameters with the water temperature data. Quantile random forest was the best performer at mtry 7 (Number of variables randomly sampled as candidates at each split) and RMSE (Root mean square error) of 0.0015, therefore it was used for making predictions. The predictions were made using two cases of water level: recorded water level and full dam steady-state at Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 (hot and cold model) and RCP 8.5 (hot and cold model). Ambient temperature increased on average by 1.6 °C for the period 2012–2053 when using recorded water level; this led to increases in water temperature of 0.9 °C, 0.8 °C, and 0.4 °C for avg6-R, avg3-R, and avg1-R, respectively, for the period 2012–2053. The same average temperature increase led to average increases of 0.7 °C for avg6-R, 0.6 °C for avg3-R, and 0.3 °C for avg1-R for a full dam steady-state for the period 2012–2053.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Machine-learning algorithms create models from training data for the purposes of estimation, prediction, and classification [14]. They are divided into parametric and nonparametric models.…”

Section: Nonparametric Machine-learning Data-model Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting the Effects of Climate Change on Water Temperatures of Roode Elsberg Dam Using Nonparametric Machine Learning Models

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The selection of these four algorithms is based on: (1). The characteristics and types of data to be processed, (2). The number of variables, and samples used, (3).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An algorithm for classification, and prediction, and (4). Each has advantages, and disadvantages in generating models during training, and data testing [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison Non-Parametric Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Employee Talent

Wirayasa

2021

Indonesian J. Comput. Cybern. Syst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Classification of ordinal data is part of categorical data. Ordinal data consists of features with values based on order or ranking. The use of machine learning methods in Human Resources Management is intended to support decision-making based on objective data analysis, and not on subjective aspects. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between features, and whether the features used as objective factors can classify, and predict certain talented employees or not. This study uses a public dataset provided by IBM analytics. Analysis of the dataset using statistical tests, and confirmatory factor analysis validity tests, intended to determine the relationship or correlation between features in formulating hypothesis testing before building a model by using a comparison of four algorithms, namely Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree, and Artificial Neural Networks. The test results are expressed in the Confusion Matrix, and report classification of each model. The best evaluation is produced by the SVM algorithm with the same Accuracy, Precision, and Recall values, which are 94.00%, Sensitivity 93.28%, False Positive rate 4.62%, False Negative rate 6.72%, and AUC-ROC curve value 0.97 with an excellent category in performing classification of the employee talent prediction model.

show abstract