2011
DOI: 10.4135/9781483387529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiating Science Instruction and Assessment for Learners with Special Needs, K-8

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This curriculum incorporated the national science curriculum standards (i.e., Grade 1–9 Science and Technology Curriculum Guidelines) in Taiwan (Ministry of Education, 2003a). Procedures for adapting the grade-level science curriculum were modified from those described by Finson et al (2011) and Browder et al (2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This curriculum incorporated the national science curriculum standards (i.e., Grade 1–9 Science and Technology Curriculum Guidelines) in Taiwan (Ministry of Education, 2003a). Procedures for adapting the grade-level science curriculum were modified from those described by Finson et al (2011) and Browder et al (2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, our findings suggest that science teachers encounter students with a range of disabilities during their careers and are apparently unprepared to do so. Teachers need to implement a variety of adaptations in order to effectively differentiate the science curriculum for students with special needs (Finson, Ormsbee, & Jensen, 2011;McGinnis & Stefanich, 2007). Topics identified of particular need include assistive technology in STEM (Moon, Todd, Morton, & Ivey, 2012), Universal Design for Learning (Burgstahler & Cory, 2008;McGinnis, 2013), and identifying metacognitive strategies to support student learning (Berkeley, Mastropieri, & Scruggs, 2011;Rosenzweig, Krawec, & Montague, 2011).…”
Section: Research Question 1 From What Sources and Within What Contexmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Consequently, there has been a growing body of research to advocate the use of analytic scales for rating composition skills because they enhance a test's reliability (Kaba&Sengül, 2016;Finson, Ormsbee, and Jensen, 2011;Dogan &Uluman, 2017). There is an advocacy for using these scales in order to ensure that empirical procedures are used for assessment.…”
Section: Developing a Rating Scale For Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%